Leon FL and Government Lawyers | George T Levesque -- eLawyers

18-1177 BREON T. DAVIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2018)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jul. 26, 2018

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT BREON T. DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D18-1177 [July 26, 2018] Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Paul L. Backman, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 09-003309CF10B, 09-005099CF10A and 11- 008711CF10A. Breon T. Davis, Raiford, pro se. No appearance required for appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. TAYLOR, MAY and FORST, JJ., concur. * * * Not ..

Syndicate Gramercy v. Daoud (1949)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 07, 1949 Citations: 43 So. 2d 334

The plaintiff-appellant, Syndicate Gramercy, Inc., by an amended petition filed under Chapter 87, F.S.A., being the Declaratory Judgment Act, prayed for an adjudication of whether or not a lease on described property situated in the City of Miami Beach was now in force and a binding legal obligation as between the parties, or had expired by operation of law and was no longer a binding lawful obligation. The lease was executed in 1942, at an annual rental of $4,500.00. Its duration was for the per..

4D08-2481 Pratt v. Weiss (2011)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Feb. 16, 2011 Citations: 53 So. 3d 1044

ANCEL PRATT JR., Appellant, v. MICHAEL C. WEISS, D.O., MICHAEL C. WEISS, D.O., P.A., LOUIS H. ISAACSON, D.O., STERLING HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC., STERLING MIAMI, INC., LAUDERDALE ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, a Florida general partnership, consisting of the following general partners: RAUL T APARACIO, M.D., P.A., MARTIN B. SILVERSTEIN, M.D., P.A., MICHAEL J. RUDDY, M.D., P.A., and MICHAEL C. WEISS, D.O., P.A., FMC HOSPITAL LTD., a Florida Limited Partnership d/b/a FLORIDA MEDICAL CENTER, FMC MEDICAL INC., f..

4D09-1901 Hale v. STATE FARM FLORIDA INS. CO. (2010)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Dec. 22, 2010 Citations: 51 So. 3d 1169

51 So. 3d 1169 (2010) Barbara HALE and Sandra Segal, Appellants, v. STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. No. 4D09-1901. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. December 22, 2010. Rehearing Denied February 15, 2011. *1170 John P. Wiederhold of Wiederhold & Moses, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellants. Neil Rose of Bernstein, Chackman, Liss & Rose, Hollywood, for appellee. POLEN, J. Appellants, Barbara Hale and Sandra Segal, appeal the trial court's order granting State Far..

4D09-1125 Diamond Blade Warehouse, Inc. v. Ktr Quorum, LLC (2010)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Sep. 08, 2010 Citations: 43 So. 3d 61

43 So. 3d 61 (2010) DIAMOND BLADE WAREHOUSE, INC. v. KTR QUORUM, L.L.C. No. 4D09-1125. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. September 8, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

87-106 Martin Marietta Corp. v. Glumb (1988)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Mar. 25, 1988 Citations: 523 So. 2d 1190

523 So. 2d 1190 (1988) MARTIN MARIETTA CORPORATION and Scott Wetzel Services, Appellants, v. Robert GLUMB, Appellee. No. 87-106. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. March 25, 1988. *1191 Bernard J. Zimmerman and Mathew D. Staver of Zimmerman, Shuffield, Kiser & Sutcliffe, P.A., Orlando, for appellants. J. David Parrish of Hurt & Parrish, P.A., Bill McCabe of Shepherd, McCabe & Cooley, Orlando, for appellee. JOANOS, Judge. Martin Marietta Corporation and Scott Wetzel Services (E/C..

17-006655RU DACCO BEHAVORIAL HEALTH, INC.; OPERATION PAR, INC.; AND ASPIRE PARTNERS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES (2017)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2017

The issue in this case is whether Florida Administrative Code Emergency Rule 65DER17-2 (the “Emergency Rule”) constitutes an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes. (Unless specifically stated otherwise herein, all references to Florida Statutes will be to the 2017 version.) More specifically, on September 19, 2017, the Florida Department of Children and Families (the “Department”), published the Emergency Rule, which dealt with the need for and licensing of new methadone medication-assisted treatment centers for persons dealing with opioid addiction. Pursuant to the Emergency Rule, the Department decided which providers would receive approval notices to submit licensure applications in certain counties based on the order in which complete and responsive applications were received by the Department. A number of parties are challenging the validity of the Emergency Rule.The Emergency Rule constitutes an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.

20-000446 TARGET CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO (2020)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 27, 2020

The issue in this case is whether Petitioner, Target Corporation ("Target"), is entitled to a consumption-on-premises alcoholic beverage license for its store at 1200 Linton Boulevard Delray Beach, Florida ("Target Delray").The Division properly exercised its discretion under the Beverage Laws when it denied the application of Target Corporation for a consumption-on-premises (4COP) liquor license.

20-002933RX INTUITION COLLEGE SAVINGS SOLUTIONS, LLC vs FLORIDA PREPAID COLLEGE BOARD (2020)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 26, 2020

The issue is whether Florida Administrative Code Rules 19B-14.001, 19B- 14.002, and 19B-14.003 (collectively the “Rules”), are each an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority for the reasons alleged by Petitioner.Petitioner demonstrated that Rules 19B-14.001, 19B-14.002 and 19B-14.003 were each an invalid exercise of delegated Legislative authority.

21-001362 CELESTE LYONS vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT (2021)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 21, 2021

Whether Petitioner is entitled to participate in the Florida Retirement System Deferred Retirement Option Program (DROP) when she submitted the DROP paperwork to her employer, but that paperwork was not submitted to Respondent within the timeframe set forth by statute or administrative rule.Petitioner was not entitled to participate in DROP where she provided DROP paperwork to employer, but it was never received by Respondent in the 12-month eligibility period.

George T Levesque