welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Gregory Allen Chaires
Gregory Allen Chaires
Gregory Allen Chaires
Visitors: 25
1
Bar #964808(FL)     License for 32 years
Altamonte Springs FL

Are you Gregory Allen Chaires? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

94-003583RX  TERESA A. BURNS vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (1994)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 30, 1994
The issue is whether Rule 33-5.008(10)(b), Florida Administrative Code, is invalid as being contrary to Section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes. Specifically, the Petitioner alleges the term "limited pat-down searches" as used in the rule is too vague and vests unbridled discretion in the agency. The agency admits that its employees have failed to properly follow the rule; however, it argues that this does not invalidate the rule.Rule 33.008(10)(b) invalid as too vague although declaration. statement-specifically looking in mouths and socks excluding strip and body cavity gaurds persisted.
96-002751RP  F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE, LTD., AND HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 07, 1996
These matters came before the undersigned on respondent's motion to dismiss petition for lack of standing filed on July 1, 1996. A response in opposition to the motion was filed by petitioners on July 5, 1996. The issue is whether petitioners have standing to initiate these rule proceedings. The parties were represented as follows: For Petitioners: Deborah A. Getzoff, Esquire E. A. Mills, Jr., Esquire Post Office Box 1438 Tampa, Florida 33601-1438Potential loss of business outside United States not a protected concern in rule proceeding; petition dismissed for lack of standing.
93-002250  BETTY CASTOR, AS COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION vs DONNY R. MCCOY  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 19, 1993
An amended administrative complaint dated February 22, 1992 alleges that Respondent violated several provisions of Section 231.28(1), F.S. and Rule 6B- 1.006(5), F.A.C. Those alleged violations are based on incidents of criminal conduct in 1978 and 1989, and Respondent's failure to disclose the incidents on various employment or teaching certificate applications. The issue in this proceeding is whether the alleged violations occurred, and if so, what discipline is appropriate.Teacher failed to disclose criminal case that was pending when he completed application. The underlying incident and dishonesty/fraud were grounds for suspension.
20-002098PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs SUBHASH GUPTA, M.D.  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 01, 2020
The issues to be determined are whether Respondent engaged in sexual misconduct and/or sexual activity in the practice of medicine in violation of section 456.072(1)(v), Florida Statutes (2019); and, if so, what is the appropriate sanction.The Department failed to prove Respondent engaged in sexual misconduct concerning his patient by clear and convincing evidence. The Administrative Complaint should, therefore, be dismissed.
96-003059RE  F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE, LTD., AND HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 28, 1996

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer