welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Gregory Donald Venz
Gregory Donald Venz
Gregory Donald Venz
Visitors: 45
0
Bar #965(FL)     License for 31 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Gregory Donald Venz? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

12-002816RX  REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOCIATION, INC., D/B/A RCMA SMITH BROWN CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 17, 2012
Whether Florida Administrative Code Rules 65C- 22.009(2)(b)1. and 3., are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority and whether a statement in a Gold Seal Quality Care Program Fact Sheet constitutes an unadopted rule in violation of section 120.54(1)(a), Florida Statutes.Petitioner failed to prove rules requiring revocation of Gold Seal designation were invalid and did not demonstrate standing to challenge agency fact sheet as an unadopted rule.
07-001969RU  LARRY PHILLIPS vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 07, 2007
Whether statements issued by the GEO Group, Inc. (GEO), a private company under contract with the Respondent, Department of Children and Family Services (Respondent or Department) to operate the FCCC constitute unpromulgated "rules" within the definition of Section 120.52, Florida Statutes (2007).Challenges to private companies internal operating policies are not "rules" of the Department. A private company is not "agency" as that term is used.
96-005104RU  DISABILITY SUPPORT SERVICES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES AND AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 30, 1996
The issue is whether portions of a Medicaid provider agreement, monitoring instrument (including support coordination assurances), and support coordination guidebook are invalid as improperly promulgated rules.Certain provisions of medicaid provider agreement are invalid rules due to general applicability. They aren't authorized by federal or state law.
97-004215RU  BOBBY JONES, CLARENCE CORNELL SIMMONS, ERNIE THOMAS, FREDDIE LEE JACKSON, VICTOR CLARK, DARRELL D. MILLER, FRANK LAWRENCE DICKENS, AND FLORIDA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES COUNCIL 79, AFSCME vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES  (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 08, 1997
Does correspondence dated August 18, 1997, from John M. Awad, Ph.D., District Administrator for District II, State of Florida, Department of Children and Family Services, directed to Theodore R. Buri, Jr., Regional Director, American Federation of State, County, and Municipal employees, AFL-CIO, identify Respondent’s agency policy? If yes, is that policy a “Rule” as defined in Section 120.52(15), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1996)? If a “Rule," has Respondent promulgated the policy in accordance with Section 120.54, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1996)? If the policy is a “Rule” that has not been promulgated, does a statutory basis exist for its promulgation?Statement by agency is not a rule. Therefore, Petitioners are not entitled to relief.
96-003141RU  DISABILITY SUPPORT SERVICES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 02, 1996
The issue is whether Respondent's Medicaid provider agreement, waiver support coordination assurances, and a related monitoring agreement should be invalidated as improperly promulgated rules.Petitioner failed to show that contracts are rules.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer