Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Guy Stewart Jr.
Guy Stewart Jr.
Visitors: 39
0
Bar #109317(FL)    
West Palm Beach FL

Are you Guy Stewart Jr.? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

87-002471  OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER vs. CHARLES LEON WINKELMAN  (1987)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Oct. 06, 1987
By administrative complaint dated April 23, 1987, Petitioner sought to revoke Respondent's registration as an associated person under the Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act. The essence of the charges are that Respondent, subsequent to registration, was convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude or fraudulent or dishonest dealing, that Respondent's registration in Alaska was revoked because of such conviction, and that Respondent failed to notify Petitioner of the criminal proceeding or revocation proceeding as required by law. At hearing, Petitioner called no witnesses, but its exhibits 1-3 were received into evidence. Respondent testified on his own behalf, and his exhibits 1-5 were received into evidence. The transcript of hearing was filed September 17, 1987, and the parties were granted leave until September 29, 1987, to file proposed findings of fact. The parties' proposed findings have been addressed in the appendix to this recommended order.Registration as an associated person revoked on conviction of a crime evi- dencing moral turpitude or fraudulent of dishonest dealing
84-004187  DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs. LIQUID ASSETS, INC.  (1984)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jul. 15, 1985
Because applicant for alcoholic beverages license never obtained premises for the business, application should be denied.
75-001311  DIVISION OF FINANCE vs. LAWRENCE H. RIPP  (1975)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jan. 21, 1976
Whether the license of Respondent as a Mortgage Solicitor should be suspended for violation of Sections 494.05 (1) (a) & (b), Florida Statutes, Rule 3-3.07(1), Florida Administrative Code, and Section 494.05(1)(g), Florida Statutes. At the commencement of the hearing, Respondent's counsel moved to dismiss the proceedings by reason of Petitioner's failure to provide witness statements of Charles R. Burke & Kathryn C. Burke, pursuant to a letter from Respondent's counsel to the Deputy Director, Division of Finance, dated August 26, 1975, requesting copies of any witness statements obtained in the course of Petitioner'S investigation. Respondent not having previously sought to compel discovery in accordance with Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, the motion was denied. At this point, Respondent's counsel announced that he had been instructed by his client, who was not present at the hearing, to leave the hearing room and take no further part in the proceedings if the motion was denied. This being the case, Respondent's counsel departed and the hearing was then conducted as an uncontested proceeding.Charges should be dismissed against Respondent for violating law which was passed after deal in question.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer