Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Harden King, Jr.
Harden King, Jr.
Visitors: 47
0
Bar #171250(FL)     License for 51 years
Orlando FL

Are you Harden King, Jr.? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

5D00-2106  CONTINENTAL CAS. COMPANY v. City of South Daytona  (2002)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jan. 11, 2002 Citations: 807 So. 2d 91
807 So. 2d 91 (2002) CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant, v. CITY OF SOUTH DAYTONA, Florida, etc., Appellee. No. 5D00-2106. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. January 11, 2002. Rehearing Denied February 18, 2002. Geoffrey D. Ringer and Rick L. Martintale of Ringer, Henry & Buckley, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant. Richard A. Sherman and Rosemary B. Wilder of Richard A. Sherman, P.A., Fort *92 Lauderdale and J.D. Fuller of Pine & Berger, Maitland, for Appellee. PETERSON, J. Cont..
5D00-1534, 5D00-1551, 5D00-1590  First Union Nat. Bank v. Estate of Mizell  (2001)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Nov. 30, 2001
807 So. 2d 78 (2001) FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, N.A., et al., Appellants, v. ESTATE OF Byron B. MIZELL, et al., Appellees. Nos. 5D00-1534, 5D00-1551, 5D00-1590. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. November 30, 2001. Rehearing Denied February 12, 2002. Martha A. Chapman, of Martha A. Chapman, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant, Alfredo Martinez-Garcia. Virginia B. Townes, of Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson, P.A., Orlando, and Kenneth L. Mann, of Kenneth L. Mann, P.A., Orlando, f..
89-6196  Frederick Leon Dotson v. J.J. Clark, Warden, Memphis Federal Correctional Institution  (1990)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Filed: Apr. 04, 1990 Citations: 900 F.2d 77
900 F.2d 77 Frederick Leon DOTSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J.J. CLARK, Warden, Memphis Federal Correctional Institution, Respondent-Appellee. No. 89-6196. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 30, 1989. Decided April 4, 1990. Harden King, Jr., Tallahassee, Fla., for petitioner-appellant. W. Hickman Ewing, Jr., U.S. Atty., Memphis, Tenn., for respondent-appellee. Before MARTIN and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, and ZATKOFF, District Judge. * BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge. 1 ..
4D08-513  Bhatti v. State  (2008)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Apr. 22, 2008 Citations: 978 So. 2d 174
978 So. 2d 174 (2008) BHATTI v. STATE. No. 4D08-513. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. April 22, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
79-563  Bove v. PBW Stock Exchange, Inc.  (1980)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Apr. 18, 1980 Citations: 382 So. 2d 450
382 So. 2d 450 (1980) Michael J. BOVE, Jr., Appellant, v. PBW STOCK EXCHANGE, INC., Appellee. No. 79-563. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. April 18, 1980. *451 John R. Patterson of Livingston, Patterson & Strickland, P.A., Sarasota, for appellant. Robert C. Widman of Nelson, Hesse, Cyril, Weber, Smith & Widman, Sarasota, for appellee. OTT, Judge. Appellant sued appellee for damages, alleging in one count a wrongful conversion of appellant's property, a seat on appellee's stoc..
95-001177  COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS vs DUCKWOOD HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.; HOWARD SEE; AND BOB SUTHERLAND  (1995)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 09, 1995
The central issue in this case is whether the Respondents unlawfully discriminated against the Intervenors in violation of Section 760.23, Florida Statutes.No housing violation where aggrieved party voluntarily moved.
90-007301  NEAL C. CURROW vs PANAMA CITY MARINE INSTITUTE, INC.  (1990)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 19, 1990
Whether respondent discriminated against petitioner on account of his age in terminating his employment, in violation of the Florida Human Relations Act, Section 760.10 et seq., Florida Statutes (1989)?Age discrimination proven by man whose duties devolved on two younger men. Reason for discharge a pretext, thereby proving circumstantial case.
85-002634  HILLHAVEN, INC., D/B/A CYPRUS GROVE HEALTHCARE CENTER vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1985)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Aug. 19, 1986
Whether certificate of need (CON) applications for nursing home beds filed by Hillhaven, Inc. d/b/a Menorah House-Hillhaven, North Riviera Beach Convalescent Center, Inc., and Manor Care of Boynton Beach, should be approved, or denied (as proposed by the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services).Certificate of Need was issued. No numerical need for nursing home beds but special circumstance present. Project provided unique ethnic environment for Jewish residents.
86-001230RX  LORISNA PIERRE, DIEULA ST HILAIRE, AND ST. HELENE JOIMELUS vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1986)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jul. 09, 1986
Consistent with the Notice of Hearing dated April 21, 1986, and the subsequent Order granting a continuance dated April 25, 1986, copies of both of which were forwarded to the parties herein, a hearing was held in this case before Arnold H. Pollock a Hearing Officer with the Division of Administrative Hearings, in Tallahassee, Florida on June 6, 1986. The issue for consideration was whether Respondent's Policy Statement 85-131 and paragraphs 10-12 and 10-18 of Respondent's Manual Number 165-6 constitute improperly promulgated rules which are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority. APPEARANCES For the Petitioner: Charlene Visconti, Esquire Valory Greenfield, Esquire Legal Services of Greater Miami, Inc. 1393 Southwest 1st, Suite 330Manual and policy statement re: food stamp certification is a rule which must be properly adopted. If not, as here, it is invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
84-003337  HEALTH CARE AND RETIREMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA, D/B/A HEARTLAND OF PALM BEACH COUNTY vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1984)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jul. 08, 1986
Certificate Of Need denied. Cannot ammend application and substantially change character of project. De novo review limited by Gulf Court versus DHRS, 483 So. 2d 700.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer