Orange FL Lawyers | James A Fowler -- eLawyers

Opinion No. (2007) (2007)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports Filed: Sep. 18, 2007

Dear Representative Luttrell: This office has received your request for an official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following question: When a licensed motor vehicle driver who is under the age of eighteen is fined for a non-habitual traffic violation and does not pay the fine, can a warrant for the driver's arrest be issued regardless of the driver's age JUVENILES AND TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS The subject matter of your request requires an analysis of the legal characteristic..

Opinion No. (1973)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports Filed: Jan. 16, 1973

OPINION — AG — **** LIMITATIONS ON SCHOOL PRINCIPAL BECOMING STATE LEGISLATOR **** IT CANNOT BE CONCLUDED AS A MATTER OF LAW THAT A NEWLY ELECTED STATE REPRESENTATIVE MUST RESIGN HIS FORMER POSITION AS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PRINCIPAL WHEN HE TAKES OFFICE AS REPRESENTATIVE BECAUSE OF THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST. LEGISLATORS MUST NOT ACCEPT OUTSIDE EMPLOYMENT WHICH WILL IMPAIR THEIR INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGEMENT IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR OFFICIAL DUTIES, AND THEY MUST NOT ACCEPT OUTSIDE FULL TIME EMPLOYMENT WH..

TT-47 City of Tampa v. Green (1980)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Dec. 02, 1980 Citations: 390 So. 2d 1220

390 So. 2d 1220 (1980) CITY OF TAMPA, Appellant, v. David GREEN, Appellee. No. TT-47. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. December 2, 1980. James A. Sheehan, Tampa, for appellant. William P. Levens, Tampa, for appellee. WENTWORTH, Judge. The self-insured employer appeals a workers' compensation order which we affirm. Claimant, a garbage man for the city of Tampa, sustained a fractured skull when he fell off a garbage truck while on a new route. Although the other trucks were equi..

10532_1 Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co., Inc. (1952)

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Filed: Jun. 02, 1952 Citations: 196 F.2d 103

196 F.2d 103 UNION CARBIDE & CARBON CORP. v. GRAVER TANK & MFG. CO., Inc. et al. No. 10532. United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit. March 26, 1952. Writ of Certiorari Denied June 2, 1952. See 72 S. Ct. 1059 . Edward A. Haight, Chicago, Ill., John F. Oberlin, James R. Stewart, Thomas V. Koykka, all of Cleveland, Ohio, Casper W. Ooms, Chicago, Ill., Dugald S. McDougall, Chicago, Ill., for appellant. Richard R. Wolfe, Chicago, Ill., John T. Cahill, Cahill, Gordon Zachry & Reindel, New York C..

29 Fleitas v. Richardson (1893)

Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 06, 1893 Citations: 13 S. Ct. 429, 147 U.S. 538, 1893 U.S. LEXIS 2183, 37 L. Ed. 272

147 U.S. 538 (1893) FLEITAS v. RICHARDSON, (No. 1.) No. 29. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 14, 1892. Decided March 6, 1893. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. *543 Mr. J.R. Beckwith for appellant. Mr. Thomas J. Semmes for appellee. MR. JUSTICE GRAY, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court. At October term, 1888, this court denied a motion to dismiss or affirm, submitted on briefs under Rule 6. But on fuller co..

45 United States v. Lynah (1903)

Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 23, 1903

188 U.S. 445 (1903) UNITED STATES v. LYNAH. No. 45. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 9, 1903. Decided February 23, 1903 ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. *452 Mr. Robert A. Howard for the plaintiff in error with whom Mr. Solicitor General Richards was on the brief. Mr. J.P. Kennedy Bryan for defendant in error in No. 45. Mr. Julian Mitchell, Jr., with whom Mr. Julian Mitchell and Mr. Henry A.M. Smith were on the brief for defendants ..

17 Hazlett v. United States (1885)

Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 09, 1885 Citations: 115 U.S. 291, 1885 U.S. LEXIS 1840, 29 L. Ed. 382, 6 S. Ct. 48

6 S. Ct. 48 115 U.S. 291 29 L. Ed. 382 HAZLETT v. UNITED STATES. Filed November 2, 1885. [Syllabus from page 291 intentionally omitted] [Statement of Case from pages 291-293 intentionally omitted] T. H. N. McPherson and Enoch Totten , for appellant. [Argument of Counsel from pages 292-296 intentionally omitted] Sol. Gen. Goode , for appellee. Mr. Justice HARLAN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language delivered the opinion of the court: 1 We are of opinion that the claimant has no cause..

175 Bockfinger v. Foster (1903)

Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 01, 1903 Citations: 190 U.S. 116, 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1542, 23 S. Ct. 836, 47 L. Ed. 975

190 U.S. 116 (1903) BOCKFINGER v. FOSTER. No. 175. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 26, 1903. Decided June 1, 1903. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA. *120 Mr. James R. Keaton for appellant. Mr. John W. Shartel, Mr. Frank Wells, Mr John II. Cotteral and Mr. C.G. Hornor were on the brief. Mr. Horace Speed and Mr. Marsden C. Burch for appellees. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court. The decisive question..

247 Wilkes County v. Coler (1903)

Supreme Court of the United States Filed: May 18, 1903 Citations: 190 U.S. 107, 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1570, 23 S. Ct. 738, 47 L. Ed. 971

190 U.S. 107 (1903) WILKES COUNTY v. COLER. No. 247. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 17, 20, 1903. Decided May 18, 1903. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. Mr. A.C. Avery for petitioners. Mr. John F. Dillon for respondents. Mr. Harry Hubbard, Mr. John M. Dillon and Mr. Charles Price were on the brief. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court. This is an action against Wilkes County, North Carolina, *108 upon certain bonds, each reciting th..

47 Montgomery v. Portland (1903)

Supreme Court of the United States Filed: May 18, 1903 Citations: 190 U.S. 89, 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1569, 23 S. Ct. 735, 47 L. Ed. 965

190 U.S. 89 (1903) MONTGOMERY v. PORTLAND. No. 47. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 9, 1903. Decided May 18, 1903. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON. *93 Mr. John H. Mitchell for plaintiff in error. Mr. Thomas D. Rambaut and Mr. C.E.S. Wood, for defendants in error, with whom Mr. George H. Williams was on the brief. *103 MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court. This case cannot be distinguished in principle from Cumm..

James A Fowler