Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
James Harold Thompson
James Harold Thompson
Visitors: 53
0
Bar #121325(FL)     License for 56 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you James Harold Thompson? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

87-574  Yates v. State  (1987)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jul. 09, 1987 Citations: 509 So. 2d 1249
509 So. 2d 1249 (1987) Howard Curtis YATES, Sr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 87-574. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. July 9, 1987. *1250 Howard C. Yates, Sr., pro se. Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Pamela D. Cichon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee. ORFINGER, Judge. Defendant appeals from a summary denial of his claim for relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. He contends first, that the portion of his senten..
3D08-1830  Green v. State  (2008)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Aug. 04, 2008 Citations: 990 So. 2d 1073
990 So. 2d 1073 (2008) GREEN v. STATE. No. 3D08-1830. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. August 04, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Hab.Corp.denied.
2D10-1975  Sellers v. State  (2010)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 27, 2010 Citations: 37 So. 3d 863
37 So. 3d 863 (2010) SELLERS v. STATE. No. 2D10-1975. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. May 27, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Habeas Corpus denied.
95-004221RU  WITHLACOOCHEE RIVER ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1995)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 24, 1995
The issues for determination in this case are whether certain provisions of the 1993 Florida Utility Accommodation Manual which have been adopted by Respondent, the FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, as rules by reference in Rule 14-46.001(3), Florida Administrative Code, constitute invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority. The specific provisions of the 1993 Florida Utility Accommodation Manual which are at issue include the definitions of "utility" and "utility facilities" (page 4), the "no monetary gain" provision (page 7), and the "joint use" provision (page 12). In addition, Petitioners raised an issue as to whether Respondent, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION violated Section 120.535, Florida Statutes, by failing to adopt by rule certain agency requests for information from Petitioner regarding costs associated with the installation and maintenance of utility poles.Rules of Department of Transportation providing for joint use of state rights of way by utilities and for no monetary gain in use of there are valid.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer