Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida
Filed: Aug. 31, 1993
The issue for disposition in this proceeding is whether, as required by subsection 501.017(1)(b)1., F.S., and rules 5J-4.003(1) and 5J-4.012, F.A.C., Respondent, a health studio, provided its patrons a facility of equal quality, within five driving miles, at no extra cost, when Respondent's facility closed in January, 1993.Health club that did not provide alter racquetball facilities on closing is liable for membership refund to members who used racquetball exclusively.
