Leon FL Lawyers | James Vincent Antista -- eLawyers

01-002114RP THOMAS D. MCGILL, RONALD J. PRITCHARD, DANIEL J. DVORAK, ROBERT H. ATKINS, AND RUSSELL P. GENTILE vs FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 31, 2001

The issue is whether proposed regulations for Brevard County manatee protection areas by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC), which are amendments to Rule 68C- 22.006, Florida Administrative Code, noticed in the April 20, 2001, Florida Administrative Weekly (F.A.W.)("Proposed Rule"), with a Notice of Change published in the F.A.W. on June 15, 2001, are an invalid exercise of legislative authority.Challenges to proposed rule are dismissed. Proposed rule not vague and does not exceed delegated legislative authority.

01-002197RP STANDING WATCH, INC.; JIM KALVIN; THOMAS MASON; DOUGLAS P. JAREN; AND STOWELL ROBERTSON vs FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 04, 2001

The issue is whether proposed regulations for Brevard County manatee protection areas by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC), which are amendments to Rule 68C- 22.006, Florida Administrative Code, noticed in the April 20, 2001, Florida Administrative Weekly (F.A.W.)("Proposed Rule"), with a Notice of Change published in the F.A.W. on June 15, 2001, are an invalid exercise of legislative authority.Challenges to proposed rule are dismissed. Proposed rule not vague and does not exceed delegated legislative authority.

01-002198RP SEA RAY BOATS, INC. vs FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 04, 2001

The issue is whether proposed regulations for Brevard County manatee protection areas by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC), which are amendments to Rule 68C- 22.006, Florida Administrative Code, noticed in the April 20, 2001, Florida Administrative Weekly (F.A.W.)("Proposed Rule"), with a Notice of Change published in the F.A.W. on June 15, 2001, are an invalid exercise of legislative authority.Challenges to proposed rule are dismissed. Proposed rule not vague and does not exceed delegated legislative authority.

01-003992 SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB, INC., vs SEA RAY BOATS, INC., AND FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 17, 2001

The issue is whether proposed regulations for Brevard County manatee protection areas by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC), which are amendments to Rule 68C- 22.006, Florida Administrative Code, noticed in the April 20, 2001, Florida Administrative Weekly (F.A.W.)("Proposed Rule"), with a Notice of Change published in the F.A.W. on June 15, 2001, are an invalid exercise of legislative authority.Challenges to proposed rule are dismissed. Proposed rule not vague and does not exceed delegated legislative authority.

97-001350EPP IN RE: CITY OF TALLAHASSEE PURDOM UNIT 8 POWER PLANT SITING APPLICATION vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 13, 1997

Petitioner proved compliance with all relevant statutory and rule requirements in establishing economic, environmental, and public interest justification for granting of Power Plant Site certification.

96-002017 CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES, INC. vs FLORIDA GAME AND FRESH WATER FISH COMMISSION (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 02, 1996

Whether Charles River Laboratories, Inc.'s (CRL) applications for permits for its primate facilities on Raccoon Key, Key Lois, and Summerland Key should be granted and, the conditions, if any, that should be attached to the permits. Free ranging primates should be caged or removed from two islands in Florida Keys. They present a potential danger to public.

92-004672EPP IN RE: DADE COUNTY RESOURCES RECOVERY FACILITY PROJECT (PA 77-08B) vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION (1992)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 30, 1992

At the land use hearing, Dade County presented the testimony of Hamilton S. Oven, Jr., J. Michael Ellis, Tanhum Goldshmid, Robert Usherson, and Reinaldo Villar. Dade County's Exhibits 1 through 9 were admitted in evidence. No other party offered any testimony or exhibits. The transcript of the proceedings was filed on November 6, 1992. Dade County, the Applicant, filed its proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law on November 6, 1992. No other party filed a proposed recommended order on the land use proceeding. All proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law have been considered. A specific ruling on each proposed finding of fact is made in the Appendix attached hereto and made a part of this Recommended Order.The proposed site is consistent and in compliance with existing land use plans and zoning ordinances in Dade County, Florida.

89-004901 MANGROVE CHAPTER OF THE IZAAK WALTON LEAGUE OF AMERICA, INC. vs FLORIDA GAME AND FRESH WATER FISH COMMISSION (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 06, 1989

The issue presented in these consolidated cases is whether the Respondent, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, should issue the subject permit to Intervenors/Permittees which will allow the Intervenors/Permittees to "destroy nests and habitat of Key Largo woodrats... and Key Largo cotton mice..., to harm or molest Schaus' swallowtail butterflies... and to take Eastern Indigo snakes..., incidental to land-clearing operations and building construction of single family and cluster homes..."Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission incidental take permit regarding nests, etc of endangered and threatened species; required mitigation would enhance survival potential of species; nonrule policy

86-002751RX BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS vs. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (1986)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jul. 27, 1987

The Jupiter Inlet District, a special taxing district located in northern Palm Beach County maintains that the definition of "public navigation project" found in Rule 18-20.003(26), Florida Administrative Code, is invalid. It reads: "'Public navigation project' means a project primarily for the purpose of navigation which is authorized and funded by the United States Congress or by port authorities as defined by Section 315.02(2), Florida Statutes." The term public navigation project is substantively used in Rule 18- 20.004(1)(e), Florida Administrative Code, which establishes management policies, standards and criteria used by the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund when deteremining whether to approve request for activities on sovereignty lands in aquatic preserves. That rule states that: "(e) A lease, easement or consent of use may be authorized only for the following activities: a public navigation project; maintenance of an existing navigational channel..." Other portions of the rule provide that eligible requests for a lease, easement or consent of use will be evaluated according to stated social, economic and environmental benefit criteria.Petition dismissed. Definition of ""Public Navigation Project"" found to be valid under Rule 18-20.003(26), Florida Administrative Code.

81-001377 PATRICIA T. UYAAN vs. DIVISION OF LICENSING (1981)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Sep. 29, 1981

Whether Petitioner has sufficient experience in private investigative work to qualify her for licensure as a Class "C" private investigator under Section 493,306(4), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1980).Recommend granting Petitioner Class C private investigator license due to proof Petitioner has required experience.

James Vincent Antista