welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  7. Jeffrey A. Klatzkow
Jeffrey A. Klatzkow
Jeffrey A. Klatzkow
Visitors: 29
0
Bar #644625(FL)     License for 21 years; Member in Good Standing
Naples FL

Are you Jeffrey A. Klatzkow? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

CFR: 33 CFR 64.06

Florida Laws: 120.52, 120.54, 120.541, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.595, 120.68, 125.01, 216.011, 216.023, 327.40, 327.41, 327.60, 403.412, 985.037, 985.101, 985.245, 985.25, 985.255, 985.439, 985.64, 985.686

Florida Administrative Code: 63G-1.012, 63G-1.013, 63G-1.014, 63G-1.015, 63G-1.016, 63G-1.017

4D09-1435  Graham v. State  (2010)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Feb. 24, 2010 Citations: 29 So. 3d 307
29 So. 3d 307 (2010) GRAHAM v. STATE. No. 4D09-1435. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. February 24, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.
3D10-112  Key v. State  (2010)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Feb. 03, 2010 Citations: 36 So. 3d 678
36 So. 3d 678 (2010) KEY v. STATE. No. 3D10-112. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. February 3, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.
89-2982  Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Elbert  (1991)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Nov. 27, 1991 Citations: 590 So. 2d 15
590 So. 2d 15 (1991) WINN DIXIE STORES, INC., Appellant, v. Patricia ELBERT a/k/a, Patricia Bryant, Appellee. No. 89-2982. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. November 27, 1991. Richard N. Blank of Richard N. Blank, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant. No appearance for appellee. PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from the trial court's denial of a motion for attorney's fees. The facts of the case are simple and straightforward. Plaintiff sued defendant as a result of an alleged sli..
16-001996  JEFFREY ALAN NORKIN vs DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 12, 2016
Whether Petitioner's application for licensure should be denied based upon his prior disciplinary history by the Florida Bar and failure to provide proof of satisfaction of resulting cost judgments against him, as indicated in the Notice of Denial issued by Respondent on February 12, 2016.Petitioner's application to sell insurance should be denied based upon his prior disciplinary history by the Florida Bar and failure to provide proof of satisfaction of resulting judgments against him, as indicated in the Notice of Denial.
05-002034  COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS vs FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2005
The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the City of Naples's (City) Waterway Marker Permit Application should be granted, given the requirements of Section 327.40, Florida Statutes (2005) and Florida Administrative Code Rule 68-23.105(1)(b)(3) through (6).Respondent City of Naples failed to show that delineating new slow boat speed zones with a waterway marking permit was needed for vessel traffic congestion, significant risk of collision or threat to public safety. Recommend that the permit be denied.
05-002035  MARINE INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION OF COLLIER COUNTY, INC. vs FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION AND CITY OF NAPLES  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2005
The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the City of Naples's (City) Waterway Marker Permit Application should be granted, given the requirements of Section 327.40, Florida Statutes (2005) and Florida Administrative Code Rule 68-23.105(1)(b)(3) through (6).Respondent City of Naples failed to show that delineating new slow boat speed zones with a waterway marking permit was needed for vessel traffic congestion, significant risk of collision or threat to public safety. Recommend that the permit be denied.
05-002036  DOUGLAS FINLAY vs FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2005
The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the City of Naples's (City) Waterway Marker Permit Application should be granted, given the requirements of Section 327.40, Florida Statutes (2005) and Florida Administrative Code Rule 68-23.105(1)(b)(3) through (6).Respondent City of Naples failed to show that delineating new slow boat speed zones with a waterway marking permit was needed for vessel traffic congestion, significant risk of collision or threat to public safety. Recommend that the permit be denied.
05-002037  ERIC ALEXANDER, JACK HAIL, DAVE SIRKOS, JAMES PERGOLA AND ALLEN WALBURN vs FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION AND CITY OF NAPLES  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2005
The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the City of Naples's (City) Waterway Marker Permit Application should be granted, given the requirements of Section 327.40, Florida Statutes (2005) and Florida Administrative Code Rule 68-23.105(1)(b)(3) through (6).Respondent City of Naples failed to show that delineating new slow boat speed zones with a waterway marking permit was needed for vessel traffic congestion, significant risk of collision or threat to public safety. Recommend that the permit be denied.
12-003418GM  CHRISTINE DAVIS vs CITY OF VENICE  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 28, 2012
The issue is whether certain revisions to the City of Venice's (City's) Comprehensive Plan (Plan) adopted by Ordinance No. 2012-15 on August 14, 2012, are in compliance.Petitioner failed to establish that plan amendments were not in compliance or that she was prejudiced by a procedural error during the adoption process.
06-002629  UNION LABOR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY vs OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULATION  (2006)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 19, 2006
Whether Petitioner, the Union Labor Life Insurance Company (Union Labor Life), is entitled to a certificate of authority to transact insurance in the State of Florida.The evidence showed that Petitioner is entitled to a certificate of authority. The order includes a discussion of estoppel.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer