welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Jerri Ann Blair
Jerri Ann Blair
Jerri Ann Blair
Visitors: 54
0
Bar #525332(FL)     License for 39 years; Member in Good Standing
Tavares FL

Are you Jerri Ann Blair? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

N-225  Eagle v. State  (1971)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 25, 1971 Citations: 249 So. 2d 460
249 So. 2d 460 (1971) Donald L. EAGLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. N-225. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. May 25, 1971. Rehearing Denied July 9, 1971. Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, Gerald Sohn and Bartley K. Vickers, Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant. Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Nelson E. Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. WIGGINTON, Acting Chief Judge. Appellant was indicted, tried by a jury and found guilty of the offense of forcible..
07-000085  MELVIN AND TAMMY GIEGER vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 08, 2007
The issue to be resolved in this proceeding concerns whether the Petitioners have been guilty of violation of pertinent statutes and rules governing qualification and capability to hold a foster home license and to operate a foster home, in this case a "therapeutic foster home" and, if so, whether their application for renewal of licensure should be denied.Petitioners met the qualifications to be relicensed as a Therapeutic Foster Home. There was no evidence of abuse, no financial disqualification, and no evidence of unlicensed operations.
94-005398  THOMPSON FRUIT COMPANY vs GOLDEN GEM GROWERS, INC., AND FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND  (1994)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 26, 1994
The issues for determination in this case are whether Respondent, as a licensed citrus fruit dealer, misappropriated and marketed citrus fruit owned by Petitioner during the 1992-1993 shipping season, and further, whether such actions constitute a violation of the Florida Citrus Code for which proceeds of the citrus fruit dealer's bond executed by Co-Respondent should be paid to Petitioner in satisfaction of Petitioner's claim pursuant to Section 601.66, Florida Statutes.Evidence failed to establish claim against citrus fruit dealer. Bond not subject to claim.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer