Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
John Benjamin Fricke Jr.
John Benjamin Fricke Jr.
Visitors: 70
0
Bar #901910(FL)     License for 33 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you John Benjamin Fricke Jr.? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

15-002888PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JOHN L. LENTZ, JR., M.D.  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 22, 2015
The issues to be determined in this proceeding are whether Respondent, John L. Lentz, Jr., M.D., committed the disciplinary violations charged with respect to seven patients in three Administrative Complaints that have been consolidated for the purpose of hearing. If the facts demonstrate that any of the charged violations have been committed, then the appropriate penalty to be imposed for such violations must be recommended.Petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent departed from the standard of care with respect to seven patients, kept inadequate records, and failed to report diagnosis of Lyme disease. Recommend revocation and a fine.
15-002889PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JOHN L. LENTZ, JR., M.D.  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 22, 2015
The issues to be determined in this proceeding are whether Respondent, John L. Lentz, Jr., M.D., committed the disciplinary violations charged with respect to seven patients in three Administrative Complaints that have been consolidated for the purpose of hearing. If the facts demonstrate that any of the charged violations have been committed, then the appropriate penalty to be imposed for such violations must be recommended.Petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent departed from the standard of care with respect to seven patients, kept inadequate records, and failed to report diagnosis of Lyme disease. Recommend revocation and a fine.
15-002890PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JOHN L. LENTZ, JR., M.D.  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 22, 2015
The issues to be determined in this proceeding are whether Respondent, John L. Lentz, Jr., M.D., committed the disciplinary violations charged with respect to seven patients in three Administrative Complaints that have been consolidated for the purpose of hearing. If the facts demonstrate that any of the charged violations have been committed, then the appropriate penalty to be imposed for such violations must be recommended.Petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent departed from the standard of care with respect to seven patients, kept inadequate records, and failed to report diagnosis of Lyme disease. Recommend revocation and a fine.
15-006760F  KENNETH STAHL, M.D. vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 25, 2015
The issue in this case is whether Kenneth D. Stahl, M.D. ("Dr. Stahl" or "Petitioner"), is entitled to an award of attorneys' fees and costs to be paid by the Department of Health, Board of Medicine ("Department" or "Respondent"), pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2014).1/The Administrative Complaint was not shown to be unsupported by material facts or by the application of then-existing law to those facts so as to warrant award of attorneys' fees under section 57.105, Florida Statutes.
15-000775PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs KENNETH D. STAHL, M.D.  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 13, 2015
The issues in this case are whether Respondents performed a wrong procedure on patient C.C., as set forth in the second amended administrative complaints, and if so, what is the appropriate sanction.Petitioner failed to prove that a wrong procedure was performed where the infected organ was removed and the patient's symptoms resolved, although the procedure that had been identified was not performed, because the procedure may have been misidentified.
15-000776PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs EDDIE MANNING, M.D.  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 13, 2015
The issues in this case are whether Respondents performed a wrong procedure on patient C.C., as set forth in the second amended administrative complaints, and if so, what is the appropriate sanction.Petitioner failed to prove that a wrong procedure was performed where the infected organ was removed and the patient's symptoms resolved, although the procedure that had been identified was not performed, because the procedure may have been misidentified.
12-001575PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs CHRISTOPHER CARTER, M.D.  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 01, 2012
The issue to be resolved is whether Respondent, Dr. Christopher Carter, M.D. (“Respondent” or “Dr. Carter”), was convicted of, pled guilty, or pled nolo contendere to a crime directly related to the practice or the ability to practice medicine, in violation of section 456.072(1)(c), Florida Statutes (2009), and if so, what penalty should be imposed?Respondent pled guilty to a crime related to the practice or ability to practice medicine, i.e., possession of child pornography, a federal felony.
11-001271PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF PHYSICAL THERAPY vs MARLY DELIS CUETO, P.T.  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 11, 2011
The issues in this case are whether Respondent: (a) was convicted of a crime which directly relates to the practice of physical therapy; (b) failed to timely report a criminal conviction to the Board of Physical Therapy Practice; and (c) was terminated from the Medicaid program, as Petitioner has alleged; and, if one or more of these allegations are established, whether the Board should impose discipline on Respondent's physical therapy license within the applicable penalty guidelines or take some other action.Respondent was convicted of a crime which directly relates to the practice of physical therapy and failed to timely report the conviction. She was also terminated from the Medicaid program. For these offenses, discipline is recommended.
11-001272PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF PHYSICAL THERAPY vs MARLY DELIS CUETO, P.T.  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 11, 2011
The issues in this case are whether Respondent: (a) was convicted of a crime which directly relates to the practice of physical therapy; (b) failed to timely report a criminal conviction to the Board of Physical Therapy Practice; and (c) was terminated from the Medicaid program, as Petitioner has alleged; and, if one or more of these allegations are established, whether the Board should impose discipline on Respondent's physical therapy license within the applicable penalty guidelines or take some other action.Respondent was convicted of a crime which directly relates to the practice of physical therapy and failed to timely report the conviction. She was also terminated from the Medicaid program. For these offenses, discipline is recommended.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer