Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
John Lewis Allbritton
John Lewis Allbritton
Visitors: 63
0
Bar #247421(FL)     License for 47 years; Member in Good Standing
Cantonment FL

Are you John Lewis Allbritton? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 120.569120.57760.10

79-2266  Kendall East Estates, Inc. v. Banks  (1980)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jul. 22, 1980 Citations: 386 So. 2d 1245
386 So. 2d 1245 (1980) KENDALL EAST ESTATES, INC., Appellant, v. David P. BANKS and Joan S. Banks, His Wife, Appellees. No. 79-2266. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. July 22, 1980. Rehearing Denied September 4, 1980. *1246 Krongold & Bass and Paul H. Bass, Coral Gables, for appellant. Krause, Reinhard & Linden and Frank H. Tamen, Miami, for appellees. Before BARKDULL, SCHWARTZ and NESBITT, JJ. SCHWARTZ, Judge. On July 20, 1978, Kendall East Estates, Inc. and Mr. and Mrs. Banks..
03-001805  MILDRED M. MOULTRIE vs FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 20, 2003
The issue for determination is whether Petitioner was subjected to discrimination in the work environment by Respondent due to Petitioner's race in violation of Section 760.10, Florida Statutes.Petitioner failed to prove racial animus on the part of Respondent. Recommended that the Petition be dismissed.
88-002859  BOARD OF VETERINARY MEDICINE vs. SAMUEL R. MONROE  (1988)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Dec. 01, 1989
The issues requiring adjudication in this cause concern whether the Respondent's license as a veterinarian in the State of Florida should be revoked, suspended or other discipline imposed for alleged violations of Chapter 474, Florida Statutes. Those violations involve alleged cruelty to animals treated by the Respondent and whether his treatment and behavior toward those animals amounted to fraud, deceit, negligence, incompetence or misconduct in the practice of veterinary medicine. Also at issue are charges in the Complaint concerning whether the Respondent violated the enumerated sections of Chapter 474, Florida Statutes, involving being convicted or found guilty, regardless of adjudication, of a crime which directly relates to the practice of veterinary medicine. It must also be determined whether the Respondent, with regard to some of the animals treated and named in the Complaint, failed to maintain his veterinary medical records in accordance with the related and enumerated subsections of Chapter 474, Florida Statutes, and the related rule. Finally, if the charges, or any of them, are substantiated, the question of a recommended penalty must be addressed.No witness expert or other, establish what appropriate veterinary care standard should be under circumstances. No clear and convincing evidence to show violations except minor record.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer