welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  7. John Merritt Lockwood
John Merritt Lockwood
John Merritt Lockwood
Visitors: 25
0
Bar #28056(FL)     License for 18 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you John Merritt Lockwood? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

15-007010RP  DANIA ENTERTAINMENT CENTER, LLC vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
The issues for disposition in this case are whether proposed rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5), Florida Administrative Code, which consist of the repeal of said rules, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes; and whether the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering’s (Respondent), failure to prepare a statement of estimated regulatory costs constituted a material failure to follow the applicable rulemaking procedures or requirements set forth in chapter 120.The proposed repeal of rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5) dealing with "designated player" games, was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
15-007011RP  DAYTONA BEACH KENNEL CLUB, INC, vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
The issues for disposition in this case are whether proposed rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5), Florida Administrative Code, which consist of the repeal of said rules, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes; and whether the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering’s (Respondent), failure to prepare a statement of estimated regulatory costs constituted a material failure to follow the applicable rulemaking procedures or requirements set forth in chapter 120.The proposed repeal of rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5) dealing with "designated player" games, was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
15-007012RP  JACKSONVILLE KENNEL CLUB, INC, vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
The issues for disposition in this case are whether proposed rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5), Florida Administrative Code, which consist of the repeal of said rules, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes; and whether the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering’s (Respondent), failure to prepare a statement of estimated regulatory costs constituted a material failure to follow the applicable rulemaking procedures or requirements set forth in chapter 120.The proposed repeal of rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5) dealing with "designated player" games, was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
15-007013RP  MELBOURNE GREYHOUND PARK, LLC vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
The issues for disposition in this case are whether proposed rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5), Florida Administrative Code, which consist of the repeal of said rules, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes; and whether the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering’s (Respondent), failure to prepare a statement of estimated regulatory costs constituted a material failure to follow the applicable rulemaking procedures or requirements set forth in chapter 120.The proposed repeal of rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5) dealing with "designated player" games, was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
15-007014RP  BONITA-FORT MYERS CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
The issues for disposition in this case are whether proposed rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5), Florida Administrative Code, which consist of the repeal of said rules, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes; and whether the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering’s (Respondent), failure to prepare a statement of estimated regulatory costs constituted a material failure to follow the applicable rulemaking procedures or requirements set forth in chapter 120.The proposed repeal of rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5) dealing with "designated player" games, was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
15-007015RP  INVESTMENT CORPORATION OF PALM BEACH vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
The issues for disposition in this case are whether proposed rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5), Florida Administrative Code, which consist of the repeal of said rules, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes; and whether the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering’s (Respondent), failure to prepare a statement of estimated regulatory costs constituted a material failure to follow the applicable rulemaking procedures or requirements set forth in chapter 120.The proposed repeal of rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5) dealing with "designated player" games, was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
15-007016RP  WEST FLAGLER ASSOCIATES, LTD. vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
The issues for disposition in this case are whether proposed rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5), Florida Administrative Code, which consist of the repeal of said rules, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes; and whether the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering’s (Respondent), failure to prepare a statement of estimated regulatory costs constituted a material failure to follow the applicable rulemaking procedures or requirements set forth in chapter 120.The proposed repeal of rules 61D-11.001(17) and 61D-11.002(5) dealing with "designated player" games, was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
17-003727  SUMMER JAI-ALAI PARTNERSHIP vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 28, 2017
The issue is whether Petitioner's Notice of Intent to Withdraw License should be granted or dismissed.Agency may not withdraw operating license for mistake but must revoke it on statutory ground. Attempt to restrict holder of converted permit under s. 550.0745 from using s. 550.475 to relocate summer jai-alai to different county is unadopted rule.
15-003656RX  THE HOSPICE OF THE FLORIDA SUNCOAST, INC., D/B/A SUNCOAST HOSPICE vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 24, 2015
The issue in this existing rule challenge filed pursuant to section 120.56(3), Florida Statutes (2015),1/ is whether Florida Administrative Code Rule subparagraphs 59C-1.008(2)(a)2. and (2)(a)3. are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority for the reasons alleged by Petitioner.Petitioner failed to prove that challenged parts of the fixed need pool rule are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority under section 120.52(8)(b), (c), or "flush-left" paragraph, or that they are illegal procedural rules that are void.
16-001009  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING vs JACKSONVILLE KENNEL CLUB, INC.  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 19, 2016
Whether Jacksonville Kennel Club violated section 849.086(12)(a), Florida Statutes (2015), by conducting unauthorized card games in its cardroom, and section 849.086(6)(c), by allowing unlicensed persons to work in its cardroom; and, if so, whether the Division should be estopped from prosecuting Jacksonville Kennel Club. Also at issue is whether the allegations of the Administrative Complaint constitute an unadopted rule in violation of section 120.57(1)(e)1., Florida Statutes.Peitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent operated specified card games in violation of s. 849.086(12), but failed to prove that it allowed persons to work without valid occupational licenses in violation of s. 849.086(6).

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer