886 F. Supp. 837 (1995) LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant. No. 93-30586-RV. United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division. February 24, 1995. *838 Mark A. Newell, Barker & Janecky, P.C., Pensacola, FL, for plaintiff Lexington Ins. Co. Paul B. Butler, Jr., Butler, Burnette & Pappas, Tampa, FL, for defendant Royal Ins. Co. of America. ORDER VINSON, District Judge. Pending is defendant Royal Insurance Company of America's motion..
The issue to be determined is whether Petitioners timely filed their petition for hearing to challenge the determination made by the Department of Environmental Protection (“Department”) that Respondent Perry Funk’s proposed dock project is exempt from the requirement to obtain an environmental resource permit.Petitioners failed to prove statements were made to them by a Department employee that justify application of the doctrine of equitable tolling to excuse their late-filed petition for hearing.
The issue is whether a Consent Order executed by Respondents on March 25, 2010, and by the Department of Environmental Protection (Department) and the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund (Board) on April 1, 2010, is a reasonable exercise of the Department's enforcement authority.Consent Order to resolve outstanding violations by marina was not shown to be an abuse of DEP's enforcement discretion.
The issue is whether Respondent Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) may issue to Respondent Republic Services of Florida, L.P. (Republic), permits to construct and operate a Class III landfill, pursuant to Permit Numbers 266830-003-SC/01 and 266830-004-SO/01, as modified as set forth below.Permit approved for Class I landfill if DEP adds conditions regarding the level of knowledge required in accepting certain prohibited wastes, requiring more frequent leachate monitoring, allowing other parties to obtain split samples, & requiring spotter.
The issue is whether Respondent Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) may issue to Respondent Republic Services of Florida, L.P. (Republic), permits to construct and operate a Class III landfill, pursuant to Permit Numbers 266830-003-SC/01 and 266830-004-SO/01, as modified as set forth below.Permit approved for Class I landfill if DEP adds conditions regarding the level of knowledge required in accepting certain prohibited wastes, requiring more frequent leachate monitoring, allowing other parties to obtain split samples, & requiring spotter.
The issue is whether Respondent Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) may issue to Respondent Republic Services of Florida, L.P. (Republic), permits to construct and operate a Class III landfill, pursuant to Permit Numbers 266830-003-SC/01 and 266830-004-SO/01, as modified as set forth below.Permit approved for Class I landfill if DEP adds conditions regarding the level of knowledge required in accepting certain prohibited wastes, requiring more frequent leachate monitoring, allowing other parties to obtain split samples, & requiring spotter.
The issue is whether Respondent Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) may issue to Respondent Republic Services of Florida, L.P. (Republic), permits to construct and operate a Class III landfill, pursuant to Permit Numbers 266830-003-SC/01 and 266830-004-SO/01, as modified as set forth below.Permit approved for Class I landfill if DEP adds conditions regarding the level of knowledge required in accepting certain prohibited wastes, requiring more frequent leachate monitoring, allowing other parties to obtain split samples, & requiring spotter.
