welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. John Stephen Menton
John Stephen Menton
John Stephen Menton
Visitors: 146
0
Bar #331181(FL)     License for 43 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you John Stephen Menton? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

20-001138BID  AMBAR TRAIL, LTD vs NARANJA LAKES HOUSING PARTNERS, LP, SLATE MIAMI APARTMENTS, LTD., AND FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 02, 2020
Whether the Petitions filed by Ambar Trail, Ltd.; Sierra Meadows Apartments, Ltd.; and Quail Roost Transit Village IV, Ltd., should be dismissed for lack of standing.Petitioner failed to demonstrate that they could receive funding under any scenario or that the process was otherwise fundamentally unfair; therefore, recommended dismissal for lack of standing.
20-001139BID  SIERRA MEADOWS APARTMENTS, LTD vs NARANJA LAKES HOUSING PARTNERS, LP, SLATE MIAMI APARTMENTS, LTD., AND FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 02, 2020
Whether the Petitions filed by Ambar Trail, Ltd.; Sierra Meadows Apartments, Ltd.; and Quail Roost Transit Village IV, Ltd., should be dismissed for lack of standing.Petitioner failed to demonstrate that they could receive funding under any scenario or that the process was otherwise fundamentally unfair; therefore, recommended dismissal for lack of standing.
20-001140BID  QUAIL ROOST TRANSIT VILLAGE IV, LTD vs NARANJA LAKES HOUSING PARTNERS, LP, SLATE MIAMI APARTMENTS, LTD., AND FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 02, 2020
Whether the Petitions filed by Ambar Trail, Ltd.; Sierra Meadows Apartments, Ltd.; and Quail Roost Transit Village IV, Ltd., should be dismissed for lack of standing.Petitioner failed to demonstrate that they could receive funding under any scenario or that the process was otherwise fundamentally unfair; therefore, recommended dismissal for lack of standing.
20-001141BID  PARC GROVE, LLC vs NARANJA LAKES HOUSING PARTNERS, LP, HARBOUR SPRINGS, LLC, AND FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 02, 2020
Whether the Petitions filed by Ambar Trail, Ltd.; Sierra Meadows Apartments, Ltd.; and Quail Roost Transit Village IV, Ltd., should be dismissed for lack of standing.Petitioner failed to demonstrate that they could receive funding under any scenario or that the process was otherwise fundamentally unfair; therefore, recommended dismissal for lack of standing.
19-002276BID  FOUNTAINS AT KINGS POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 30, 2019
The issues in this protest are whether either or both of Respondent's intended actions in dispute——namely, (i) deeming one application eligible for funding despite the existence of reasonable grounds for uncertainty as to whether the amount of capital the applicant's equity proposal states will be invested during construction is sufficient to cover development costs; and (ii) awarding another applicant a number of proximity points based on information in its application that was later discovered to be mistaken——are contrary to governing statutes, administrative rules, or the specifications of the solicitation; and, if so, whether the erroneous action or actions are contrary to competition, clearly erroneous, or arbitrary or capricious.Intended action deeming an application eligible despite material ambiguity therein regarding the amount of equity available for construction should be set aside; another applicant's proximity points should be reduced to conform to corrected distance data.
17-005769  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs REHABILITATION CENTER AT HOLLYWOOD HILLS, LLC  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 17, 2017
The issues to be determined in this case are whether Respondent, Rehabilitation Center at Hollywood Hills, LLC ("Hollywood Hills"), violated Florida law as alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint filed by the Agency for Health Care Administration ("AHCA" or "Agency"); and, if so, what sanctions should be imposed.AHCA demonstrated Hollywood Hills commited several Class 1 violations resulting in, or contributing to, the deaths of 9 patients and a mass casualty incident in the aftermath of a loss of A/C from Hurricane Irma. Recommend license revocation.
17-005388RE  FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF HOMES AND SERVICES FOR THE AGING, INC., D/B/A LEADINGAGE FLORIDA vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, AND DEPARTMENT OF ELDER AFFAIRS  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 26, 2017
Whether Florida Administrative Code Emergency Rules 58AER17-1 and 59AER17-1 (collectively referred to as “the Emergency Rules”) are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority and whether an immediate danger justified issuance of the Emergency Rules.Respondents failed to demonstrate the existence of an immediate danger. Also, Petitioners demonstrated that the Emergency Rules are invalid.
17-005409RE  FLORIDA ASSISTED LIVING ASSOCIATION, INC., A FLORIDA NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION vs FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ELDER AFFAIRS  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 27, 2017
Whether Florida Administrative Code Emergency Rules 58AER17-1 and 59AER17-1 (collectively referred to as “the Emergency Rules”) are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority and whether an immediate danger justified issuance of the Emergency Rules.Respondents failed to demonstrate the existence of an immediate danger. Also, Petitioners demonstrated that the Emergency Rules are invalid.
17-005445RE  FLORIDA ARGENTUM vs DEPARTMENT OF ELDER AFFAIRS  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 29, 2017
Whether Florida Administrative Code Emergency Rules 58AER17-1 and 59AER17-1 (collectively referred to as “the Emergency Rules”) are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority and whether an immediate danger justified issuance of the Emergency Rules.Respondents failed to demonstrate the existence of an immediate danger. Also, Petitioners demonstrated that the Emergency Rules are invalid.
17-006655RU  DACCO BEHAVORIAL HEALTH, INC.; OPERATION PAR, INC.; AND ASPIRE PARTNERS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2017
The issue in this case is whether Florida Administrative Code Emergency Rule 65DER17-2 (the “Emergency Rule”) constitutes an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes. (Unless specifically stated otherwise herein, all references to Florida Statutes will be to the 2017 version.) More specifically, on September 19, 2017, the Florida Department of Children and Families (the “Department”), published the Emergency Rule, which dealt with the need for and licensing of new methadone medication-assisted treatment centers for persons dealing with opioid addiction. Pursuant to the Emergency Rule, the Department decided which providers would receive approval notices to submit licensure applications in certain counties based on the order in which complete and responsive applications were received by the Department. A number of parties are challenging the validity of the Emergency Rule.The Emergency Rule constitutes an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer