Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
John William Staunton
John William Staunton
Visitors: 43
0
Bar #126950(FL)     License for 27 years
Clearwater FL

Are you John William Staunton? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

  Johns v. State  (1933)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jul. 05, 1933 Citations: 110 Fla. 478, 151 So. 484
Writ of error dismissed on motion of the Attorney General.
SC14-2112  In Re: Amendments to Rule Regulating The Florida Bar 4-1.5 - Fees and Costs for Legal Services  (2015)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Sep. 17, 2015
Supreme Court of Florida _ No. SC14-2112 _ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO RULE REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR 4-1.5—FEES AND COSTS FOR LEGAL SERVICES. [September 17, 2015] PER CURIAM. This matter is before the Court on the petition of The Florida Bar proposing that the Court amend the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. As part of its biennial rule amendments, The Florida Bar proposed amendments to Rule Regulating The Florida Bar 4-1.5 (Fees and Costs for Legal..
17-004276MTR  MARIO LARRIGUI-NEGRON vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 26, 2017
The issue to determine in this matter is the amount of the money to be reimbursed to the Agency for Health Care Administration for medical expenses paid on behalf of Petitioner, a Medicaid recipient, following Petitioner’s recovery from a third party.As commanded by the First DCA, no reasonable basis existed to reject Petitioner’s evidence that the Medicaid lien should be reduced. Accordingly AHCA's lien is reduced to $11,637.54.
17-005454MTR  JARED BRUNO RAMELLA vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 29, 2017
The issue for determination is the amount of money Petitioner, Jared Bruno Ramella, must pay to Respondent, Agency for Health Care Administration (“AHCA” or “the Agency”), out of his settlement proceeds as reimbursement for past Medicaid expenditures pursuant to section 409.910, Florida Statutes (2017).1/ More specifically, it must be determined whether Petitioner must pay the default amount of the Medicaid lien, $121,065, pursuant to section 409.910(11)(f); and, if not, what portion of his $775,000 settlement proceeds is due to AHCA.Pet. proved by a preponderance of the evidence that $10,324 of the total third-party recovery represents the share of the settlement proceeds fairly attributable to past medical expenditures & that amount is available to satisfy AHCA's Medicaid lien.
16-004873MTR  NICALEA R. GONZALEZ, AS NATURAL GUARDIAN AND LEGAL GUARDIAN OF THE PROPERTY OF HER DAUGHTER, AMORA GONZALEZ vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 23, 2016
The issue to be determined in this matter is the amount of money to be reimbursed to the Agency for Health Care Administration for medical expenses paid on behalf of Amora Gonzalez, a Medicaid recipient, following Petitioner’s recovery from a third party.Petitioner did not prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that a lesser portion of Petitioner's total recovery should be allocated as reimbursement for medical expenses than the amount the Agency calculated using the section 409.910(11)(f) formula.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer