The issues for disposition in this case are whether Hamilton Downs violated section 550.01215(3), Florida Statutes (2013), by failing to operate all performances specified on its license on the date and time specified, and whether the Division should be estopped from prosecuting Hamilton Downs.Petitioner failed to prove that Respondent failed to operate all of its permitted horse race performances at the date and time specified in its license.

The issue to be determined is whether Respondent has violated section 458.331(1)(b), (kk), and (nn), Florida Statutes (2011), as alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and if so, what penalty should be imposed?Petitioner proved that Respondent had action taken against her New Jersey medical license, failed to report the action to Florida, and failed to update her profile.

The issue presented is whether Respondent, Roberto Rivera, M.D. (Dr. Rivera or Respondent), violated section 458.331(1)(b) and (kk), Florida Statutes (2012), as alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that New Jersey took action against Respondent's New Jersey medical license, and Respondent did not report the New Jersey action to the Florida Board of Medicine.

The issue to be determined is whether Respondent has violated sections 456.072(1)(hh) and 458.331(1)(s), Florida Statutes (2009), and if so, what sanction should be imposed?The Department demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent was terminated from PRN for violatng his contract and is impaired. Recommend suspension followed by 5 years probation.

The issues in this case are whether Respondent committed the allegations contained in the Administrative Complaint, and if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Respondent is guilty of performing an unauthorized procedure in violation of section 456.072(1)(bb). Recommend letter of concern, continuing education, and $750 fine.

The issues in this case are whether Respondent, whose license to practice medicine was revoked in Maryland on a malpractice charge, is guilty in Florida of the offense of being disciplined in another jurisdiction; and if so, whether Petitioner should impose discipline on Respondent's medical license within the applicable penalty guidelines or take some other action.Respondent, whose license to practice medicine was revoked in Maryland on a malpractice charge, is guilty in Florida of the offense of being disciplined in another jurisdiction, but the penalty should be reduced based on mitigating circumstances.

The issue in this case is whether Respondent should be disciplined for being terminated from a treatment program for impaired practitioners by the Physician's Resource Network.DOH proved that impaired physician was terminated from PRN monitoring contract for non-compliance without good cause.

Did Respondent, James Sotrop, M.D. (Dr. Sotrop), violate section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2007),1/ by committing medical malpractice by failing to adequately assess patient P.A.'s complaints and symptoms? Did Dr. Sotrop violate section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes, by committing medical malpractice by failing to order diagnostic imaging studies and laboratory tests for P.A.? Did Dr. Sotrop violate section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes, by committing medical malpractice by failing to document a complete patient history and physical examination? Did Dr. Sotrop violate section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes, by committing medical malpractice by failing to immediately refer P.A. to the emergency department of a hospital on January 14, 2007? Did Dr. Sotrop violate section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes by committing medical malpractice by failing to refer P.A. for specialized consultations? Did Dr. Sotrop violate section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes by committing medical malpractice by making an inappropriate diagnosis of P.A.'s condition? Did the Petitioner, Department of Health (Department), fail to properly notify Dr. Sotrop of its investigation and provide an opportunity to respond to the allegations before determining probable cause? If so, do sections 456.073(1) and 458.331(9), Florida Statutes, require dismissal of the complaint?2/Failure to keep adequate or accurate records is not medical malpractice as prohibitted by section 458.331(1)(t). Department of Health failed to prove medical malpractice by failing to prove the applicable standard of care or violation of it.

The issues in this case are whether Respondent committed the allegations contained in the Administrative Complaint, and if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Respondent departed from the standard of care where he failed to timely pursue amputation of patient's leg, prescribe post-operative antibiotics, and order an infectious disease consult. Records violation also demonstrated. Recommend fine and probation.