welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Julia Gilcher Lomonico
Julia Gilcher Lomonico
Julia Gilcher Lomonico
Visitors: 92
0
Bar #102633(FL)     License for 12 years
West Palm Beach FL

Are you Julia Gilcher Lomonico? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

16-001861  CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH vs PALM BEACH COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, AND SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 01, 2016
The issue to be determined in this case is whether the Respondents, Florida Department of Transportation (“FDOT”) and Palm Beach County (also referred to as “the Applicants”), are entitled to the issuance of an Environmental Resource Permit (“ERP”) to construct an extension of State Road 7 (“SR 7”) and its associated surface water management system in Palm Beach County.Petitioner failed to prove that the applicants were not entitled to the environmental resource permit to build the SR 7 extension and associated surface water management system.
18-004498BID  HELICOPTER APPLICATORS, INC. vs COASTAL AIR SERVICE, INC., AND SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 28, 2018
Whether the South Florida Water Management District’s (“District”) intended award of a contract for aerial spraying services, granular application services, and aerial transport services, to Coastal Air Services, Inc. (“Coastal”), is contrary to the District’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or the bid specifications; and, if so, whether the decision was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Petitioner did not prove that the District's intended award of the contract to Respondent, Coastal, was contrary to the bid specifications.
17-004081  SOUTHPORT RANCH, LLC vs D.R. HORTON, INC., OSCEOLA COUNTY, AND SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 18, 2017
The issues in this case are: 1) whether the Petitioner, Southport Ranch, LLC (Petitioner), is a substantially affected person with standing to challenge the Respondent, South Florida Water Management District’s (District) intent to issue Environmental Resource Permit (Mitigation Banking) Number 49-00007-M to the Respondents, D.R. Horton, Inc., and Osceola County (Applicants); and 2) the number of potential mitigation bank credits that the District should award to the Applicants.Petitioner did not carry its burden of proving that Respondents were not entitled to the proposed amount of mitigation credits. Respondents carried their burden of showing entitlement to the requested mitigation bank permit.
17-002566  MARTIN COUNTY AND ST. LUCIE COUNTY vs ALL ABOARD FLORIDA OPERATIONS, LLC; FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY, LLC; AND SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 02, 2017
Applicants demonstrated their entitlement to an Environmental Resource Permit Modification and a Verification of Exemption for a stormwater management system to serve express passenger train facilities.
16-005718  MARTIN COUNTY AND ST. LUCIE COUNTY vs ALL ABOARD FLORIDA - OPERATIONS, LLC; FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY, LLC; AND SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 30, 2016
The issues to be determined in these consolidated cases are whether All Aboard Florida – Operations, LLC (“the Applicant”), and Florida East Coast Railway, LLC (“FECR”), are entitled to an Environmental Resource Permit Modification authorizing the construction of a stormwater management system and related activities to serve railway facilities, and a verification of exemption for work to be done at 23 roadway crossings (collectively referred to as “the project”).Applicants demonstrated their entitlement to an Environmental Resource Permit Modification and a Verification of Exemption for a stormwater management system to serve express passenger train facilities.
14-002415  DUMP THE PUMPS, INC., ET AL., vs FLORIDA KEYS AQUEDUCT AUTHORITY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 20, 2014
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether Respondent Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority ("FKAA") is entitled to issuance, by Respondent Department of Environmental Protection ("DEP"), of permit numbers 295404-018-DWC/CM ("Permit 18"), 295404-019-DWC/CM ("Permit 19"), 295404-025-DWC/CM ("Permit 25"), and 295404-027- DWC/CM ("Permit 27") (hereafter "Permits at Issue") authorizing the dryline construction of domestic wastewater collection and transmission systems in the lower Florida Keys.1/Petitioners did not prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Respondent failed to provide reasonable assurance entitling it to issuance of wastewater collection systems permits. Recommend issuance of permits.
14-002416  DUMP THE PUMPS, INC., AND JIM SKURA vs FLORIDA KEYS AQUEDUCT AUTHORITY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 20, 2014
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether Respondent Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority ("FKAA") is entitled to issuance, by Respondent Department of Environmental Protection ("DEP"), of permit numbers 295404-018-DWC/CM ("Permit 18"), 295404-019-DWC/CM ("Permit 19"), 295404-025-DWC/CM ("Permit 25"), and 295404-027- DWC/CM ("Permit 27") (hereafter "Permits at Issue") authorizing the dryline construction of domestic wastewater collection and transmission systems in the lower Florida Keys.1/Petitioners did not prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Respondent failed to provide reasonable assurance entitling it to issuance of wastewater collection systems permits. Recommend issuance of permits.
14-002417  DUMP THE PUMPS, INC., AND GAIL KULIKOWSKY, AND MARGARET SCHWING vs FLORIDA KEYS AQUEDUCT AUTHORITY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 20, 2014
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether Respondent Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority ("FKAA") is entitled to issuance, by Respondent Department of Environmental Protection ("DEP"), of permit numbers 295404-018-DWC/CM ("Permit 18"), 295404-019-DWC/CM ("Permit 19"), 295404-025-DWC/CM ("Permit 25"), and 295404-027- DWC/CM ("Permit 27") (hereafter "Permits at Issue") authorizing the dryline construction of domestic wastewater collection and transmission systems in the lower Florida Keys.1/Petitioners did not prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Respondent failed to provide reasonable assurance entitling it to issuance of wastewater collection systems permits. Recommend issuance of permits.
14-002420  DUMP THE PUMPS, INC., AND DEBORAH CURLEE vs FLORIDA KEYS AQUEDUCT AUTHORITY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 20, 2014
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether Respondent Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority ("FKAA") is entitled to issuance, by Respondent Department of Environmental Protection ("DEP"), of permit numbers 295404-018-DWC/CM ("Permit 18"), 295404-019-DWC/CM ("Permit 19"), 295404-025-DWC/CM ("Permit 25"), and 295404-027- DWC/CM ("Permit 27") (hereafter "Permits at Issue") authorizing the dryline construction of domestic wastewater collection and transmission systems in the lower Florida Keys.1/Petitioners did not prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Respondent failed to provide reasonable assurance entitling it to issuance of wastewater collection systems permits. Recommend issuance of permits.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer