NC Lawyers | Kathryn Lynne Kasprzak -- eLawyers

00-001535 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs MARTHA N. M. PILAPIL, M.D. (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 10, 2000

The issue for consideration in this case is whether Respondent's license as a physician in Florida should be disciplined because of the matters alleged in the Administrative Complaint filed herein.Evidence was insufficient to prove practice below standards, but was sufficient to show failure to keep proper records.

00-003807PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs SELLAL AHMED, M.D. (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 12, 2000

Should the medical license of Respondent, Sellal Ahmed, M.D., be disciplined for violation of Subsection 458.331(1)(s), Florida Statutes, because it is alleged that he is unable to practice medicine with reasonable skill and safety to patients by reason of illness or use of alcohol, drugs, narcotics, chemicals, or any other type of material or as a result of any mental or physical condition.Respondent violated Subsection 458.331(1)(s), Florida Statutes; medical license suspended indefinitely until able to demonstrate ability to practice with reasonable skill and safety; five years probation; $1,000 fine.

00-005098PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs BABU V. MANGILIPIDI, M.D. (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 18, 2000

Did the Respondent commit the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint dated May 16, 2000, and if so, what penalty should be imposed?The Board presented sufficient evidence to establish facts to show Respondent to be guilty of conduct to justify revocation.

01-000674PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs DAVID LOWELL WILLIAMS, M.D. (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 16, 2001

The issue is whether Respondent's license as a medical doctor should be disciplined for the reasons given in the Administrative Complaint filed on October 25, 2000.Doctor did not deviate from standard of care or record keeping requirement while treating patient for heart disease.

00-004224PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs DEJENE ABEBE, M.D. (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 12, 2000

The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the Respondent has violated Section 458.331(1)(j) and (x), Florida Statutes, and, if so, what if any penalty should be imposed.Petitioner failed to prove by preponderant evidence that alleged sexual misconduct with patient occurred. Various evidential facts showed Respondent`s testimony and evidence more credible.

00-004048PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs HOWARD E. GROSS, M.D. (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 02, 2000

Whether disciplinary action should be taken against the license to practice medicine of Respondent, Howard E. Gross, M.D., based on allegations that he violated Subsection 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes, as alleged in the Administrative Complaint in this proceeding.Respondent is not guilty of violating Subsection 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes, as alleged in the Administrative Complaint.

01-000665PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs GHULAM MOHAMMED, M.D. (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 15, 2001

Is Respondent subject to discipline for his actions in relation to Patient J.N.?The evidence was insufficient to prove that Respondent exercised influence to engage a patient in sexual activity.

00-003455PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ZAFAR S. SHAH, M.D. (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 16, 2000

Did the Respondent commit the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint dated June 26, 2000, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed?Petitioner presented sufficient evidence to show that Respondent had violated the statutes and rules alleged in the Administrative Complaint.

00-004817PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ZAFAR S. SHAH, M.D. (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 28, 2000

Did the Respondent, Zafar S. Shah, M.D. (Dr. Shah), commit the violations alleged in Counts 7-10 of the Administrative Complaint dated June 26, 2000, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed?Board failed to present clear and convincing evidence that Respondent was guilty of charges set out in Counts 7 through 10 of the Administrative Complaint.

00-002588 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs IRA W. FREILICH, M.D. (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 23, 2000

Whether Respondent violated various provisions of Chapter 458, Florida Statutes, to wit: (1) Subsection 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes, by failing to practice medicine with that level of care, skill, and treatment which is recognized by a reasonably prudent similar physician as being acceptable under similar conditions and circumstances, with regard to patients known in this record as B. D., S. R., L. R. and E. M.; (2) Subsection 458.331(1)(g), Florida Statutes, by utilizing liquid injectable silicone in his treatment of patients B. D., S. R., L. R. and E. M., in violation of the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act and thereby failing to comply with a statutory or legal obligation placed upon a licensed physician; and (3) Subsection 458.331(1)(u), Florida Statutes, by utilizing liquid injectable silicone, an investigational device not approved for general medical use or for use in plastic surgery, and not conforming to prevailing standards of medical practice in Altamonte Springs or any other community in Florida, thereby engaging in experimentation on a human subject. If Respondent is guilty of said violations, what discipline should be imposed.Respondent is guilty of failure to practice medicine with appropriate level of care; failure to comply with statutory obligations; and performing experimentation on human subjects without fully informed consent.

Kathryn Lynne Kasprzak