DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ROBERT BRELAND, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D18-537 [May 15, 2019] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Lawrence Michael Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 432015CF001019, 432015CF001021, 432015CF001023 and 432015CF001029. Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Timothy Wang, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahas..

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _ No. 1D17-3770 _ DAVID CHARLES SUSSMAN, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee. _ On appeal from the Circuit for Leon County. Charles W. Dodson, Judge. June 7, 2019 PER CURIAM. Appellant David Charles Sussman has challenged a prison disciplinary report and an order of sanctions entered by the trial court. We affirm the trial court’s decision to deny his petition for writ of mandamus without comment. We agree with Mr. Sussman, however, th..

The Honorable H. Lee Moffitt Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives Office of the Speaker Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Dear Representative Moffitt: This is in response to your request for an opinion on the proposed amendment to the Florida Constitution, commonly referred to as Proposition I, which would limit revenues received by the state and each taxing unit to 1980-1981 revenue dollars plus ad valorem taxes on subsequent construction and annual adjustments of two-thirds of the Consumer ..

162 B.R. 616 (1993) In re William A. BROWN, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 93-02504-8P7. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. December 29, 1993. J. Stanford Lifsey, Tampa, FL, for debtor. Stephen L. Meininger, Trustee, Meininger & Meininger, P.A., and Shirley C. Arcuri, Tampa, FL, for trustee. ORDER ON TRUSTEE'S OBJECTION TO CLAIM OF EXEMPTIONS ALEXANDER L. PASKAY, Chief Judge. THIS IS a Chapter 7 case and the matter under consideration is an objection to the exemptions claimed b..

650 So. 2d 692 (1995) The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Jay Stephen ZLOCKOWER, Appellee. No. 94-843. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. February 22, 1995. Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Mark C. Katzef, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant. Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Asst. Public Defender, for appellee. Before BASKIN, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ. COPE, Judge. The State appeals an order imposing a downward departure sentence. We reverse. *693 In 199..

932 So. 2d 514 (2006) Linda Lou HALE, Appellant, v. SHEAR EXPRESS, INC., d/b/a Hair Express, Appellee. No. 1D05-3636. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. June 20, 2006. David Bromley of The Bleakley Law Firm, Tampa, Susan W. Fox of Fox & Loquasto, Tampa, and Wendy S. Loquasto of Fox & Loquasto, Tallahassee, for Appellant. David K. Beach, and Elizabeth P. Mulligan of Rissman, Barrett, Hurt, Donahue & McLain, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. In this workers' compensation case..

Whether the Respondents' real estate licenses in Florida should be disciplined based upon the charge that the Respondents are guilty of failing to maintain the required entrance sign on or about the entrance to the principal office in violation of Subsection 475.22, Florida Statutes and Rule 21V-10.024, Florida Administrative Code and are therefore in violation of Subsection 475.25(1)(e), Florida Statutes. Whether the Respondents' real estate licenses in Florida should be disciplined based upon the charge that Respondents are guilty of failing to register a branch office in violation of Subsection 475.24, Florida Statutes, and Rule 21V-10.023, Florida Administrative Code, and therefore are in violation of Subsection 475.25(1)(e), Florida Statutes. Whether the Respondents' real estate licenses in Florida should be disciplined based upon the charge that the Respondent Max S. Long, Jr., is guilty of failing to be a signatory on all escrow accounts in violation of Rule 21V-14.010, Florida Administrative Code and therefore is in violation of Subsection 475.25(1)(e), Florida Statutes. Whether the Respondents' real estate licenses in Florida should be disciplined based upon the charge that the Respondents' are guilty of failing to maintain trust funds in the real estate brokerage escrow bank account or some other proper depository until disbursement thereof was properly authorized in violation of Subsection 475.25(1)(k), Florida Statutes. Whether the Respondents' real estate licenses in Florida should be disciplined based upon the charge that Respondents' are guilty of culpable negligence or breach of trust in any business transaction in violation of Subsection 475.25(1)(b), Florida Statutes.Respondent guilty of escrow account violations & for failing to register branch office.

The central issue in this case is whether the Respondent is guilty of the violations alleged in the amended administrative complaint filed January 30, 1990; and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner established respondent guilty of 626.611 and wilfully circumvented 4-46.004 Florida Administrative Code. Respondent wilfully misrepresented policy and demonstrated not trustworthy

The issue for consideration herein is whether Respondent's license and eligibility for licensure as a Health Insurance Agent in Florida should be disciplined because of the alleged misconduct outlined in the Administrative Complaint filed herein.Insurance salesman who sold duplicative coverage and who switched policies from one company to another to earn more commission guilty of actionable misconduct.