Leon FL Administrative law and Health care Lawyers | Kelly A -- eLawyers

Kelly Ann Bennett

Visitors: 157

Bar #112178(FL) License for 28 years; Member in Good Standing

Tallahassee FL

Are you Kelly Ann Bennett? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 116.13, 120.52, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.68, 20.19, 20.21, 287.012, 287.017, 287.057, 30.29, 400.021, 408.806, 409.901, 409.907, 409.908, 409.910, 409.913, 409.919, 465.003, 465.015, 465.016, 465.019, 465.023, 465.025, 7.10, 713.19

Florida Administrative Code: 59G-6.010

99-002258 ROBERT PANTLIN, D/B/A AVANT GUARD II vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 19, 1999

The issue is whether Petitioner is entitled to relocation benefits from Respondent after receipt of settlement proceeds, pursuant to a final judgment entered following Petitioner's acceptance of an offer of judgment made during the condemnation action previously prosecuted by Respondent.The Department of Transportation is not liable for Petitioner`s relocation benefits when an Offer of Judgment - Final Judgment included these benefits.

99-005345 WEST COAST TOWING vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 21, 1999

Did the Department of Transportation (Department) improperly deny a refund to Petitioner of a penalty assessed pursuant to Chapter 316, Florida Statutes?The Department of Transportation met its burden of proof to show that Petitioner violated Section 316.515(3)(a), Florida Statutes.

98-004459 RITE MEDIA vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 07, 1998

Whether Petitioner's applications for two outdoor advertising signs in Sumter County, Florida, should be approved.Where land owners` consent required to erect outdoor sign, extrinsic proof of consent is required from applicant.

99-002106 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 05, 1999

The issue for consideration in these cases is whether the Respondent's signs must be removed because of a failure to display advertising copy for a period of 12 months or longer.Non-conforming billboards that did not display advertising for more than ten months were unlawful, could not be permitted, and must be removed.

98-002961 AMERISEAL OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 07, 1998

Whether the Petitioner is properly qualified to participate in the disadvantaged business enterprise program.Under the rules adopted by the Department, the Petitioner failed to show she was qualified.

99-001161 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs ROYAL TRUCKING COMPANY (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 10, 1999

The issue is whether Petitioner correctly assessed Respondent with a penalty in the amount of $4,754 based on the overweight permit violations set forth in Load Report Citation Number 141945M.Respondent violated special conditions on its overweight trip permit. Petitioner properly assessed a penalty based on the number of pounds the loaded vehicle exceeded the legal weight limit.

99-001660 SOUTHWORTH ADVERTISING DISPLAYS vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 07, 1999

Is Southworth Advertising Displays, Petitioner (Southworth), entitled to a permit for a sign in Madison County, Florida, 1.5 miles west of U.S. 221, on the north side of I-10 facing east, DOAH Case No. 99-1660T, to be issued by the Department of Transportation, Respondent (the Department)? Is Southworth entitled to permits issued by the Department for a sign in Madison County, Florida, 1.31 miles east of County Road 255, on the north side of I-10 facing east and west, DOAH Case No. 99-1661T?The proposed location of the advertising signs does not comply with the regulatory statute.

99-000726BID D. A. B. CONSTRUCTORS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 17, 1999

The issue is whether the Department of Transportation's proposed award of a contract to Intervenor for ten highway projects in Hernando County, Florida, was contrary to the agency's rules and policies, and the bid specifications, as alleged by Petitioner.Where vendor timely filed bid papers with Department of Transportation, but in wrong office, error was minor and could be waived.

98-004123 JAMES O. SCOTT vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 17, 1998

The issue for consideration in this case is whether Petitioner’s mother is eligible for a replacement housing payment in addition to funds already received from the Department.Owner of property taken by state for parkway did not satisfy burdens to show entitlement to additional relocation housing replacement payment.

97-003899 TAMPA NORTH AERO PARK, INC. vs ALBERT E. WARNER; RENEE WARNER, III; AND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 26, 1997

The issue in the case is whether Albert E. Warner's application for an Airspace Obstruction Permit should be granted.Applicant entitled to airspace obstruction permit. Agency is not prevailing party even though agency proposed to issue permits; applicant is prevailing party.