The issue is whether the plan amendment adopted by the City of St. Pete Beach (City) by Ordinance No. 2017-03 is in compliance.City failed to demonstrate that the initial pleading in this case was filed for an improper purpose. Request for sanctions denied.
The issue for determination in this proceeding is whether Respondent retaliated against Petitioner in violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, based upon her complaints about a coworker’s conduct perceived by Petitioner to be sexual harassment.In this summary proceeding, Petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case of retaliatory employment discrimination; accordingly, the Petition is dismissed.
Whether Respondent, a place of public accommodation, violated Chapter 760 and Section 413.08, Florida Statutes (2006), by failing to accommodate Petitioner, an individual with a disability.Petitioner claimed, but failed to prove discrimination based on disability and his necessity for a service dog.
The issue for determination in this proceeding is whether the Respondent discriminated against Petitioner on the basis of handicap under Section 760.10, Florida Statutes, or disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), by failing to award him the physical science/chemistry teaching position at Nease High School.Petitioner showed that actions of the Respondent were based upon Respondent`s perception that he couldn`t perform the duties of teaching due to two DUI arrests nearly 20 yrs old. Respondent failed to follow its own procedure in handling Petitioner`s case.
The issue to be resolved in this proceeding concerns whether Respondent's employment as a teacher should be terminated for just cause, as delineated in Section 1012.33(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2005).Petitioner failed to show force against student by Respondent teacher was unreasonable under factual circumstances and therefore no misconduct and loss of effectiveness proven. Termination of Respondent reversed and all relevant lost benefits awarded.
The issue is whether Respondent committed an unlawful employment action against Petitioner by discriminating against her based on her disability in violation of Section 760.10, Florida Statutes (2005).Petitioner did not present a prima facie case of discrimination based on her alleged disability of depression.
