Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida
Filed: Jan. 10, 2019
The issues are: 1) pursuant to section 320.641(1)(a), Florida Statutes,1 whether Petitioner has proved that Respondent's intention to eliminate five zip codes from Petitioner's Primary Area of Responsibility (PAR)2 constitutes a modification of its contract with Respondent to sell Porsche motor vehicles; if so, whether Petitioner has proved that the modification will adversely alter its rights or obligations under the contract or will substantially impair its sales, service obligations, or investment; and, if so, whether Petitioner has proved that Respondent failed to provide 90 days' prior written notice of the proposed modification to Petitioner and the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (Department) with the specific grounds for the intended modification; and 2) pursuant to section 320.641(3), if Petitioner has proved that Respondent's intention to eliminate the zip codes meets the conditions of section 320.641(1)(a), whether Petitioner has filed, within the 90 days' notice period, a petition for a determination that the intended modification is unfair and, if so, whether Respondent has proved that the intended modification is fair because it has been undertaken in good faith and for good cause.Dealer's area of responsibility part of franchise contract because Evidence Code, parole evidence rule, and Statute of Frauds do not apply to administrative proceedings. Removal of 2 zip codes voided. Removal of 3 zip codes allowed because immaterial.