Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida
Filed: Jan. 20, 1995
The issue in this case is whether an amendment to the Metropolitan Dade County comprehensive plan adopted as Item No. 6, Ordinance No. 94-192, is "in compliance", as those terms are defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes.Petitioner failed to prove plan amendment lacked data and analysis, internal consistency or an intensity standard.
