welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  7. Kimberly Sisko Ward
Kimberly Sisko Ward
Kimberly Sisko Ward
Visitors: 50
0
Bar #71552(FL)     License for 30 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Kimberly Sisko Ward? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 110.1165, 110.219, 110.604, 120.569, 120.57, 435.04, 435.07, 7.25, 985.644

Florida Administrative Code: 60L-33.004, 60L-34.004

09-005433  LILLIAN ANDERSON vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 06, 2009
Whether the Petitioner received a salary overpayment from the Respondent for leave usage to which she was not entitled, as set forth in amended correspondence dated October 2, 2009, and, if so, the amount of any overpayment.Department employee paid for leave taken but not available. Recommend that employee repay $66.65 in salary overpayment.
09-003862  FLORA OSBORNE vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 21, 2009
The issue is whether Petitioner should receive an exemption from employment disqualification pursuant to Section 435.07, Florida Statutes.Petitioner demonstrated rehabilitation by clear and convincing evidence. Recommend granting exemption from disqualification.
09-003441  JAMES L. LOWERY, JR. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 23, 2009
The issue to be resolved concerns whether the Petitioner received, and should be compelled to repay, an alleged salary overpayment of $1,306.09.Petitioner did not prove that Respondent had not overpaid him. Respondent showed the Petitioner had been overpaid because he did not have donated sick leave in sufficient amounts and therefore was absent without approval.
08-003841SED  CAROL WELLS vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 05, 2008
The issue to be determined is whether Petitioners' layoffs from employment by the Respondent were lawful and if not, what remedies should be awarded.Respondent did not violate the appropriate rules when laying off Petitioners.
08-004189SED  TITUS TILLMAN vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 25, 2008
The issue to be determined is whether Petitioners' layoffs from employment by the Respondent were lawful and if not, what remedies should be awarded.Respondent did not violate the appropriate rules when laying off Petitioners.
08-002126SED  GLORIA PRESTON vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 29, 2008
The issue to be determined is whether Petitioners' layoffs from employment by the Respondent were lawful and if not, what remedies should be awarded.Respondent did not violate the appropriate rules when laying off Petitioners.
08-002161SED  STEPHEN REID vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 01, 2008
The issue to be determined is whether Petitioners' layoffs from employment by the Respondent were lawful and if not, what remedies should be awarded.Respondent did not violate the appropriate rules when laying off Petitioners.
03-003670BID  MAD DADS OF GREATER OCALA, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 08, 2003
The issue in these cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice's (Department) proposed award of certain contracts to Bay Area Youth Services, Inc. (BAYS), based on evaluations of proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposals is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Failure to make proper deposit at time of filing bid protest requires dismissal of petition. Evidence fails to establish Respondent`s evaluation of proposals was erroneous or unreasonable.
03-003671BID  JUVENILE SERVICES PROGRAM, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 08, 2003
The issue in these cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice's (Department) proposed award of certain contracts to Bay Area Youth Services, Inc. (BAYS), based on evaluations of proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposals is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Failure to make proper deposit at time of filing bid protest requires dismissal of petition. Evidence fails to establish the Respondent`s evaluation of proposals was erroneous or unreasonable.
03-003672BID  JUVENILE SERVICES PROGRAM, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 08, 2003
The issue in these cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice's (Department) proposed award of certain contracts to Bay Area Youth Services, Inc. (BAYS), based on evaluations of proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposals is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Failure to make proper deposit at time of filing bid protest requires dismissal of petition. Evidence fails to establish Respondent`s evaluation of proposals was erroneous or unreasonable.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer