welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Krys Godwin
Krys Godwin
Krys Godwin
Visitors: 82
0
Bar #2305(FL)     License for 31 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Krys Godwin? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

  Raulston v. Hortt  (1928)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jul. 12, 1928 Citations: 117 So. 875, 96 Fla. 215
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be and the same is hereby a..
  Richmond v. Town of Largo  (1944)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Nov. 24, 1944 Citations: 155 Fla. 226, 19 So. 2d 791
Appellant is the owner of past due bonds and coupons issued by the City of Largo as created by Chapters 10760 and 10761, Acts of 1925. He filed his amended bill of complaint to secure a declaratory decree against the City adjudicating his right to enforce payment of said bonds and coupons. This appeal is from an order dismissing the amended bill of complaint. The Town of Largo was incorporated under Chapter 6715, Acts of 1913. Chapters 10760 and 10761, Acts of 1925, changed its name to the City o..
  Richmond v. Town of Largo  (1944)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Nov. 24, 1944 Citations: 155 Fla. 226, 19 So. 2d 791
Appellant is the owner of past due bonds and coupons issued by the City of Largo as created by Chapters 10760 and 10761, Acts of 1925. He filed his amended bill of complaint to secure a declaratory decree against the City adjudicating his right to enforce payment of said bonds and coupons. This appeal is from an order dismissing the amended bill of complaint. The Town of Largo was incorporated under Chapter 6715, Acts of 1913. Chapters 10760 and 10761, Acts of 1925, changed its name to the City o..
  Adams v. Turner and Hus.  (1926)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Feb. 22, 1926 Citations: 107 So. 645, 91 Fla. 296
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby aff..
  State Ex Rel. v. Rinehart, Jr.  (1939)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 10, 1939 Citations: 140 Fla. 645, 192 So. 819
In June, 1939, the City of Coral Cables held an election to elect three city commissioners, two for four years and one for two years. Voting machines were employed and there were 206 absentee ballots cast. Hollis Rinehart, Jr., received 733 votes by voting machine and 106 absentee votes or a total of 839 votes. Joe Whitley received 765 votes by voting machine and 73 absentee votes or a total of 838 votes. Wallace A. Bell received 759 votes by voting machine and 65 absentee votes or a total of 824..
  In Re: Paul Grubb  (1934)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Sep. 07, 1934 Citations: 116 Fla. 387, 156 So. 482
This is an application for an alternative writ of mandamus against the Florida Railroad Commission to require it to issue to relator a "for hire permit" to engage in carriage for hire of used household goods, furnishings and furniture. Chapter 14764, Laws of Florida. It is the relator's contention in this case that the issuance of a "for hire" permit, as distinguished from a certificate of public convenience and necessity, is a mandatory duty devolving upon the Railroad Commission under the statu..
  Ward v. State  (1936)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Mar. 12, 1936 Citations: 123 Fla. 248, 166 So. 563
The writ of error brings for review a judgment of conviction of the offense of larceny of three certain cows. The only contention made by the plaintiffs in error is that reversible error occurred by reason of the giving of a charge as follows, which was given by the court of its own motion, to-wit: "The law is that where one is found in the possession of recently stolen property, and does not make a creditable explanation as to how he came into possession of such property, it is prima facie evide..
  Hillsborough County v. Highway Engineering Const.  (1940)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Nov. 22, 1940 Citations: 145 Fla. 83, 199 So. 499
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 85 Two companion cases are here for our consideration, this one involving Woodmont Avenue, and the other Henderson Boulevard, both situate in Hillsborough County. In October, 1937, the chancellor entered his order transferring this cause from the chancery to the common law court in obedience to the mandate of this Court, issued in the case of Highway Engineeri..
  Hillsborough County v. Highway Engineering Const.  (1940)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Nov. 22, 1940 Citations: 145 Fla. 83, 199 So. 499
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 85 Two companion cases are here for our consideration, this one involving Woodmont Avenue, and the other Henderson Boulevard, both situate in Hillsborough County. In October, 1937, the chancellor entered his order transferring this cause from the chancery to the common law court in obedience to the mandate of this Court, issued in the case of Highway Engineeri..
  King v. Weis-Patterson Lumber Co.  (1936)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: May 14, 1936 Citations: 124 Fla. 272, 168 So. 858
This suit was dispensed of in the Circuit Court *Page 273 on a directed verdict for the defendant. Upon writ of error to the resultant judgment, the contention here is that there was evidence adduced at the trial sufficient to take the case to the jury. The cause of action sued on in a six count declaration was generally alleged negligence on the part of the defendant sawmill company in permitting to accumulate on its mill yard and in its sheds, and under and near its tramway, particularly in a s..

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer