834 F.2d 1382 24 Fed. R. Serv. 130 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. William E. WOOD, a/k/a Steve Bishop, Appellant. No. 86-2496. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted June 12, 1987. Decided Nov. 25, 1987. Larry Byrd, Sarasota, Fla., for appellant. Debra E. Herzog, St. Louis, Mo., for appellee. Before ROSS, * Circuit Judge, BRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge, and MAGILL, Circuit Judge. MAGILL, Circuit Judge. 1 William E. Wood appeals from the district court's ** entry of judgme..

417 So. 2d 985 (1982) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Homer Allen ROSS, Respondent. No. 61511. Supreme Court of Florida. July 22, 1982. *986 Stanley A. Spring, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and Roberta J. Fox, Bar Counsel, Tampa, for complainant. Larry Byrd, Sarasota, for respondent. PER CURIAM. This attorney-discipline proceeding is before the Court on the complaint of The Florida Bar and the report of a referee. The referee found serious misconduct and recommended disbarment. Neither party has p..

974 So. 2d 624 (2008) Joshua Paul MILLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 4D06-5040. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. February 27, 2008. Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Anthony Calvello, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Laura Fisher Zibura, West Palm Beach, for appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Ruger v. State, 941 So. 2d 1182 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). WARNER, FARMER and GROSS, JJ., con..

333 So. 2d 548 (1976) Jack HEYMAN, Appellant, v. Gerald M. WEINSTEIN et al., Appellees. No. 75-645. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. April 20, 1976. Rehearing Denied May 12, 1976. Turner & Shapiro, Miami, for appellant. Weithorn & Mazloff, Coral Gables, for appellees. Before HENDRY, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ. PER CURIAM. This is an appeal by Jack Heyman, plaintiff in the trial court, from a final judgment in favor of the defendants, Gerald M. Weinstein, Sidney Katz and Kawe, I..

778 So. 2d 467 (2001) Leigh Ann WHITE, Appellant, v. Larry L. CANNON, Appellee. No. 3D00-1251. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. February 21, 2001. Raymond A. Hartz, for appellant. No appearance for appellee. Before GREEN and SHEVIN, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM. Leigh Ann White and Larry L. Cannon were divorced in 1995. The final judgment of dissolution reserved jurisdiction to award permanent custody pending a custody evaluation. The same order invested the form..

709 So. 2d 189 (1998) Barry PATTERSON, Appellant, v. Paul J. SIMONIK, Appellee. No. 97-2339. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. April 29, 1998. Laurie D. Hall, for appellant. *190 Hershoff, Lupino, DeFoor & Gregg and Mark E. Kohl, Tavernier, for appellee. Before COPE, FLETCHER and SORONDO, JJ. COPE, Judge. Barry Patterson appeals an order extending an injunction for protection against repeat violence. We remand for a new hearing. In 1996, plaintiff-appellee Paul J. Simonik obtai..

849 So. 2d 438 (2003) The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Nathaniel Charles JONES, Appellee. No. 3D02-2092. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. July 16, 2003. *439 Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Erin K. Zack, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Billie Jan Goldstein, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee. Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE, LEVY, GERSTEN, GODERICH, GREEN, FLETCHER, SHEVIN and RAMIREZ, JJ. EN BANC SHEVIN,..

Simple unintentional misstatements on application for bail bondsman license. Error cured by later submission of information. Trustworthy and fit for licensure.

The issues in this cause arise out of allegations that the Respondent violated the provisions of Chapter 466, Florida Statutes, by procuring amphetamines, procuring controlled substances for himself, procuring a controlled substance other than in the course of his dental practice, and failing to fulfill statutory record keeping requirements. At the hearing, the Petitioner called Investigator Greg P. Clift and Deputy Claude Davidson as witnesses. The Petitioner offered and had admitted two exhibits. Petitioner's Exhibit 1 is a certificate from the custodian of records for the Florida State Board of Dentistry and Exhibit No. 2 is a composite exhibit consisting of 11 D.E.A. Form 222. Respondent presented no evidence by way of live testimony and offered one composite exhibit which was admitted for the purpose of showing the character and reputation of the Respondent. That exhibit consists of eight letters from persons within the community who are familiar with the Respondent and his reputation as a dentist. Both counsel for the Petitioner and counsel for the Respondent submitted proposed recommended orders for consideration by the undersigned Hearing Officer. To the extent that the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law contained within those proposed recommended orders are not adopted herein, they were considered and determined to be either irrelevant to the issues of this cause or not supported by the evidence.There was no proof that Respondent was guilty of failing to keep adequate records of drugs or writing prescriptions for himself. Dismiss with prejudice.