Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Larry Gene McPherson Jr.
Larry Gene McPherson Jr.
Visitors: 27
0
Bar #788643(FL)     License for 35 years; Member in Good Standing
Daytona Beach FL

Are you Larry Gene McPherson Jr.? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

00-004714PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs OWEN R. HUNT, JR., M.D.  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 20, 2000
Whether disciplinary action should be taken against Respondent's license.Department alleged that doctor failed to practice medicine with the care and skill of a reasonably prudent physician. Recommend final order be entered dismissing with prejudice the complaint against Respondent.
01-000922PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs NEAL A. NIRENBERG, M.D.  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 06, 2001
Physician not guilty of practicing below standard of care by prescribing drugs in excess quantities.
00-000280  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs LIONEL RESNICK, M.D.  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 18, 2000
This is a license discipline case in which the Petitioner, by means of a one-count Administrative Complaint, seeks to take disciplinary action against the Respondent on the basis of his alleged violation of Section 458.331(1)(c), Florida Statutes.Medical doctor convicted of mail fraud in connection with conversion of over $500,000 from employer is guilty of violation of Section 458.331(1)(c), Florida Statutes.
00-001263  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JEFFREY CHESTER ALLARD, M.D.  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 27, 2000
Whether Respondent, a medical doctor, violated Section 458.331(1)(m), Florida Statutes, as alleged in Count I of the Administrative Complaint and, if so, the penalty or penalties that should be imposed. Whether Respondent violated Section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes, as alleged in Count II of the Administrative Complaint, and, if so, the penalty or penalties that should be imposed.Insufficient proof that doctor practiced below standard of care. Report did not accurately reflect his recommendation.
97-000721  BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ERNESTO PINZON-REYES  (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 13, 1997
The issues are whether Respondent is guilty of violating the applicable standard of care; prescribing a legend drug other than in the course of his professional practice; failing to keep written medical records justifying the course of treatment of the patient; making deceptive, untrue, or fraudulent representations related to the practice of medicine or employed a trick or scheme in the practice of medicine; or practicing beyond the scope permitted by law or performed professional responsibilities that he knew or had reason to know he was incompetent to perform. If so, an additional issue is what penalty should be imposed.Recommended one-year suspension for Respondent`s falsification of medical record to show administration of potassium chloride by intravenous (IV) bag instead of by IV push.
90-001500  BOARD OF MEDICINE vs WILLIAM F. GESSLER  (1990)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 05, 1990
The issue in this case is whether disciplinary action should be taken against Respondent's license to practice medicine, number ME 00067895, based on the alleged violations of Section 458.331(1), Florida Statutes, set forth in the Administrative Complaint. The allegations of the Administrative Complaint focus on the Respondent's treatment of a patient, hereinafter referred to as D.D., with legend drugs (commonly known as prescription drugs), including controlled substances, at his office during the period of October 1985 through December 1985 and later at his personal residence during the period of February 1-3, 1986. Petitioner charges that Respondent's treatment of D.D. was (1) inappropriate or excessive, and/or (2) below an acceptable standard of medical care, and that (3) Respondent failed to maintain adequate medical records to justify his course of treatment.Physician inappropriately administered controlled substances to a patient in his personal residence and failed to keep accurate records.
92-006556  BOARD OF MEDICINE vs DONALD LEE RIFE  (1992)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 30, 1992
Whether Respondent violated Section 458.331(1)(b), Florida Statutes, as alleged in Administrative Complaint.Revocation of license in another state is grounds for discriminary action here despite fact that the other state's revocation is on appeal.
92-002204  BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ROBERT E. BELL, JR.  (1992)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 08, 1992
The issue is whether the medical license of Respondent, Robert E. Bell, Jr., M.D., (Bell) should be revoked or otherwise penalized based on the acts alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint.DPR is not required to prove actual injury to a patient before it can revoke the license of a physician impaired by alcohol abuse.
91-002969  BOARD OF MEDICINE vs LEWIS SIDNEY WOLF, M.D.  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 13, 1991
The issue for consideration in this case is whether Respondent's license as a physician in Florida should be disciplined in some fashion because of the matters set forth in the Administrative Complaint filed herein.Failure to determine gestational age of fetus before terminating pregancy and keep proper records constitutes gross malpractice.
89-006816  BOARD OF MEDICINE vs DONALD LEE RIFE  (1989)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 12, 1989
The administrative complaint charges Respondent with a violation of Section 458.331(1)(s) F.S. 1989 [being unable to practice medicine with reasonable skill and safety to patients by reason of illness or use of alcohol, drugs, narcotics, chemicals or any other type of material or as a result of any mental or physical condition]. However, by pretrial stipulation, the charges were refined to address only Respondent's alleged inability to practice medicine with reasonable skill and safety to patients by reason of illness or mental or physical condition.Male psychiatrist with unprosecuted homosexual relationships with post- pubescent minors has a ""mental condition"" subject to license discipline.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer