Clay FL Land use and zoning, Personal injury and Wrongful de -- eLawyers

Larry Smith

Visitors: 44

Bar #113010(FL) License for 57 years; Member in Good Standing

Orange Park FL

Are you Larry Smith? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Ago (2001)

Florida Attorney General Reports Filed: Oct. 10, 2001

Mr. Nicholas S. Camuccio Gilchrist Assistant County Attorney 2114 Northwest 40th Terrace Suite A-1 Gainesville, Florida 32605 Dear Mr. Camuccio: You ask on behalf of Gilchrist County substantially the following questions: 1. Are building permits required for nonresidential farm buildings in light of section 604.50 , Florida Statutes 2. May the county require a zoning compliance permit under its land development regulations for nonresidential farm buildings In sum: 1. Sections 553.73 (7)(c) 1 an..

225 Port Richmond Ferry v. Hudson County (1914)

Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 08, 1914 Citations: 1914 U.S. LEXIS 1152, 234 U.S. 317, 34 S. Ct. 821, 58 L. Ed. 1330

234 U.S. 317 (1914) PORT RICHMOND AND BERGEN POINT FERRY COMPANY v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF HUDSON COUNTY. No. 225. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 4, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. ERROR TO THE COURT OF ERRORS AND APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. *318 Mr. Frank Bergen for plaintiff in error. Mr. James J. Murphy for defendant in error. *320 MR. JUSTICE HUGHES delivered the opinion of the court. The plaintiff in error, Port Richmond and Bergen Point Ferry Company, was incorpora..

1D05-4478 Batten v. State (2006)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jul. 05, 2006 Citations: 933 So. 2d 523

933 So. 2d 523 (2006) BATTEN v. STATE. No. 1D05-4478. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. July 5, 2006. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

01-36112 Esplanade Properties, Llc, a Washington Limited Liability Company v. City of Seattle (2002)

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Filed: Oct. 03, 2002

307 F.3d 978 ESPLANADE PROPERTIES, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SEATTLE, Defendant-Appellee. No. 01-36112. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 11, 2002. Filed October 3, 2002. Larry Smith, Graham & Dunn, Seattle, WA, for the plaintiff-appellant. Judith Barbour, Office of the City Attorney, Seattle, WA, for the defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington;..

07-005107GM COUNTY OF VOLUSIA; THOMAS STEVENS; ALMA MAE BUCKHALT; AND MARGARET BENNETT RAULERSON vs DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND PUTNAM COUNTY (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 07, 2007

The issue in this case is whether the amendment to the Putnam County Comprehensive Plan adopted pursuant to Ordinance 2007-27, as modified by Ordinance 2008-32, is “in compliance,” as that term is defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2008).1/Petitioners failed to prove beyond fair debate that Putnam County's comprehensive plan amendment was not "in compliance."

Larry Smith

Ago (2001)

225 Port Richmond Ferry v. Hudson County (1914)

1D05-4478 Batten v. State (2006)

01-36112 Esplanade Properties, Llc, a Washington Limited Liability Company v. City of Seattle (2002)

07-005107GM COUNTY OF VOLUSIA; THOMAS STEVENS; ALMA MAE BUCKHALT; AND MARGARET BENNETT RAULERSON vs DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND PUTNAM COUNTY (2007)

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.

Search for lawyers by practice areas.