Palm Beach FL Lawyers | Lisa B Interlandi -- eLawyers

19-12507 Sherwood G DuBose and Sharon A DuBose (1984)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida Filed: Mar. 08, 1984 Citations: 39 B.R. 7

39 B.R. 7 (1984) In re GENERAL COFFEE CORP., Domino Investments, Ltd., Alberto Duque, Colombian Coffee Co. Inc., Debtors. Bankruptcy Nos. 83-00889-BKC-TCB, 83-00902-BKC-TCB, 83-00903-BKC-TCB and 83-00904-BKC-TCB. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. March 8, 1984. David Levine, Miami, Fla., for debtors. Leonard H. Gilbert, John Olson, Tampa, Fla., for Creditors' Committee Colombian Coffee. John R. Camp, Jr., Miami, Fla., for Creditors' Committee Alberto Duque. Alan G. Greer, Miami, Fla.,..

17-23847 Kenneth D. Shapiro (1984)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida Filed: Jun. 21, 1984 Citations: 41 B.R. 235

41 B.R. 235 (1984) In re TOP SPORT DISTRIBUTORS, INC. f/k/a Top Sports Distributors, Inc., a Florida corporation, Debtor. Herbert S. FREEHLING, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Alvin GARSON and Bruce T. Davis, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 83-00138-BKC-SMW, Adv. No. 84-0025-BKC-SMW-A. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. June 21, 1984. *236 Howard J. Berlin, Miami, Fla., for defendants. William C. Stalions, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., for trustee, plaintiff. *237 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SI..

06-004544GM 1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA, INC.; AND ROSA DURANDO vs PALM BEACH COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 13, 2006

The issues in this case are whether the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan amendments which changed the future land use designations for a 97.55-acre parcel and a 26.23-acre parcel through the adoption, respectively, of Ordinance 2006-28 and Ordinance 2006-29, are “in compliance,” as that term is defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2007).1Two amendments to the Future Land Use Map of the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan are not in compliance with state law because they create internal inconsistancies.

04-004492GM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, 1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA, INC., FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, JUPITER FARMS ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL, INC., D/B/A LOXAHATCHEE RIVER COALITION, AUDUBON SOCIETY OF THE EVERGLADES AND MARIA WISE-MILLER vs PALM BEACH COUNTY (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 17, 2004

The issue in this case is whether amendments to the Palm Beach County (County) Comprehensive Plan (Plan) adopted by Ordinance Nos. 2004-34 through 2004-39, 2004-63 and 2004-64 (Amendments) to accommodate the County's development of a biotechnology research park on 1,900 acres known as the Mecca site are "in compliance," as defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes.1It was at least fairly debatable that the Plan Amendments to accommodate the County`s Scripps project were "in compliance."

06-000805 CAPTIVA CIVIC ASSOCIATION, INC., AND SANIBEL CAPTIVA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION vs SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND PLANTATION DEVELOPMENT, LTD (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 03, 2007

The issue in this case is whether the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD, or District) should issue a Modification to Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) No. 36-00583- S-02, Application No. 050408-15 to Plantation Development, Ltd. (PDL), for construction and operation of a surface water management system serving a 78.11-acre condominium development known as Harbour Pointe at South Seas Resort, with discharge into wetlands adjacent to Pine Island Sound.Applicant did not prove that all of the economically viable options to reduce or eliminate impacts to valuable wetlands were explored.

02-001014GM DONNA MELZER AND MARTIN COUNTY CONSERVATION ALLIANCE, INC. vs MARTIN COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 11, 2002

Whether Martin County Comprehensive Plan Amendments Nos. 01-11 and 01-12, pertaining to school siting and public facilities, adopted by Martin County in Ordinance No. 606, on December 11, 2001, are "in compliance," as that term is defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes. (All citations to Florida Statutes are to the 2001 version unless otherwise stated.)School siting and public facility plan amendments adopted by Martin County were subject to fair debate and therefore "in" compliance with applicable provisions of Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, and Rule 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code.

02-001015GM LLOYD BRUMFIELD AND 1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA, INC. vs MARTIN COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 11, 2002

Whether Martin County Comprehensive Plan Amendments Nos. 01-11 and 01-12, pertaining to school siting and public facilities, adopted by Martin County in Ordinance No. 606, on December 11, 2001, are "in compliance," as that term is defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes. (All citations to Florida Statutes are to the 2001 version unless otherwise stated.)School siting and public facility plan amendments adopted by Martin County were subject to fair debate and therefore "in" compliance with applicable provisions of Chapter 16, Part II, Florida Statutes, and Rule 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code.

Lisa B Interlandi