welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Maria E DeLiberato
Maria E DeLiberato
Maria E DeLiberato
Visitors: 65
0
Bar #664251(FL)     License for 22 years
Tampa FL

Are you Maria E DeLiberato? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

  Port St. Joe Dock Terminal Ry. Co. v. Maddox  (1939)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Sep. 26, 1939 Citations: 140 Fla. 110, 191 So. 775
On February 28, 1925, the Port Saint Joe Dock Terminal Railway Company entered into a vendor's and vendee's sales agreement with Fred Maddox involving certain described real estate situated in the City of Port Saint Joe, Florida. The agreement is, viz.: "THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this 28th day of February, 1925, by and between Port Saint Joe Dock Terminal Railway Company, a Florida Corporation, party of the first part, and Fred Maddox, party of the second part, WITNESSETH: That the par..
  State, Ex Rel. v. Frederick  (1936)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: May 14, 1936 Citations: 124 Fla. 290, 168 So. 252
Section 22 of Article V of the Constitution of Florida provides: "Appeal from Justice of the Peace Courts in criminal cases may be tried de novo under such regulations as the Legislature may prescribe." By statute (Sections 8471 C.G.L., 6515 R.G.S., to 8474 C.G.L., 6160 R.G.S., inclusive) the Legislature has invoked the method of appeal provided for by the Constitution and has provided in Section 8474 C.G.L., supra, that the Circuit Court "shall" proceed to try all criminal cases on appeal from J..
  Mallett v. Tunnicliffe, as Liqdr.  (1932)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Dec. 21, 1932 Citations: 107 Fla. 688, 148 So. 196
This is our third consideration of this case. See Mallett vs. Tunnicliffe, et al., 102 Fla. 809 , 136 So. 346 , *Page 689 rehearing denied 102 Fla. 820 , 137 So. 238 . In the former appeal the order of the Chancellor sustaining a general demurrer to the bill of complaint was reversed because it showed equity as to the claim of preference in favor of Appellant in the sum of $8,150. Immediately after this claim accrued Mrs. Mallett had further correspondence with the State Bank of Orlando and Trust..
  Mallett v. Tunnicliffe, as Liqdr.  (1932)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Dec. 21, 1932 Citations: 107 Fla. 688, 148 So. 196
This is our third consideration of this case. See Mallett vs. Tunnicliffe, et al., 102 Fla. 809 , 136 So. 346 , *Page 689 rehearing denied 102 Fla. 820 , 137 So. 238 . In the former appeal the order of the Chancellor sustaining a general demurrer to the bill of complaint was reversed because it showed equity as to the claim of preference in favor of Appellant in the sum of $8,150. Immediately after this claim accrued Mrs. Mallett had further correspondence with the State Bank of Orlando and Trust..
  Page v. State Board of Medical Examiners  (1940)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jan. 09, 1940 Citations: 141 Fla. 294, 193 So. 82
This is a case of original jurisdiction. The petitioner for a writ of prohibition shows that the State Board of Medical Examiners of Florida served notice on the plaintiff that they would proceed to hear charges filed against him for the revocation of his license to practice medicine in the State of Florida. The basis for the proposed revocation is that the plaintiff was convicted of a *Page 295 felony on April 5, 1935, in the District Court of the United States in and for the Western District of..
  Page v. State Board of Medical Examiners  (1940)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jan. 09, 1940 Citations: 141 Fla. 294, 193 So. 82
This is a case of original jurisdiction. The petitioner for a writ of prohibition shows that the State Board of Medical Examiners of Florida served notice on the plaintiff that they would proceed to hear charges filed against him for the revocation of his license to practice medicine in the State of Florida. The basis for the proposed revocation is that the plaintiff was convicted of a *Page 295 felony on April 5, 1935, in the District Court of the United States in and for the Western District of..
  Zetrouer v. Zetrouer  (1925)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Mar. 16, 1925 Citations: 103 So. 625, 89 Fla. 253
October 9, 1923, R. G. Zetrouer filed his amended bill in the Circuit Court of Alachua County praying for mandatory injunction to require A. B. Zetrouer to open a certain road which he the said A. B. Zetrouer had caused to be closed by constructing fences across it and depriving R. G. Zetrouer, complainant, of the use thereof. The bill was sworn to. Demurrer thereto was overruled and answer was filed denying the allegations of the bill. A large number of affidavits were filed by complainant in su..
  The Travis Co. v. Peacock Holding Co., Inc.  (1938)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jun. 15, 1938 Citations: 132 Fla. 811, 182 So. 213
The above cause having been submitted upon the transcript of record and the briefs and argument of counsel, the Court, having duly considered the questions involved, is of the opinion that there is no reversible error in the record, and the final decree appealed from is affirmed. WHITFIELD, TERRELL, BROWN, and CHAPMAN, J.J., concur. BUFORD, J., dissents.
  The Travis Co. v. Peacock Holding Co., Inc.  (1938)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jun. 15, 1938 Citations: 132 Fla. 811, 182 So. 213
The above cause having been submitted upon the transcript of record and the briefs and argument of counsel, the Court, having duly considered the questions involved, is of the opinion that there is no reversible error in the record, and the final decree appealed from is affirmed. WHITFIELD, TERRELL, BROWN, and CHAPMAN, J.J., concur. BUFORD, J., dissents.
  State Ex Rel. Hough v. Woodruff  (1941)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: May 27, 1941
Petitioner was arrested and tried in the municipal court of the City of Tampa for distributing or selling certain literature called "Watchtower" and "Consolation" without a permit or license as required by ordinance 721-A, as follows: "Peddlers, Hawkers, or Hucksters, except as otherwise provided for herein, whether using a vehicle or not, and selling or offering for sale any goods, wares, or merchandise, occupying or using any part of the street or sidewalks or other public property, or going fr..

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer