welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Mark Stephen Thomas
Mark Stephen Thomas
Mark Stephen Thomas
Visitors: 62
1
Bar #1716(FL)     License for 31 years
Gainesville FL

Are you Mark Stephen Thomas? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

19-004144PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JUSTIN C.K. DAVIS, M.D.  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 05, 2019
Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint; and if so, what penalty should be imposed.The Department failed to prove the allegations in its Administrative Complaint by clear and convincing evidence.
17-003266PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs WILLIAM T. MCKENZIE, M.D.  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 06, 2017
Whether disciplinary action should be taken against Respondent’s license to practice as a medical doctor based on allegations that he violated sections 458.331(1)(t), (m), and (q), Florida Statutes (2008-2010), as alleged in Petitioner’s Amended Administrative Complaint.The Department failed to prove the allegations in its Amended Administrative Complaint by clear and convincing evidence.
13-003520  RUTH PREVOR, PH.D. vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF PSYCHOLOGY  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 16, 2013
Whether Petitioner, Ruth Prevor, Ph.D. ("Dr. Prevor"), should be granted a variance or waiver from Florida Administrative Code Rule 64B19-11.0035.Applicant for licensure as psychologist by endorsement failed to establish that she should be granted a variance or waiver from Florida Administrative Rule 64B19-11.0035.
96-000817RX  THE HILLHAVEN CORPORATION, D/B/A FIFTEEN NAMED NURSING HOMES, ET AL. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 13, 1996
The issue is whether an amendment to Rule 59G-6.010, Florida Administrative Code (1995), was an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority due to the Agency's failure to follow applicable rulemaking procedures.Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) properly applied amended rule after its effective date. Before that time AHCA acted pursuant to non-rule policy.
96-002944RX  INTEGRATED HEALTH SERVICES, INC.; INTEGRATED HEALTH SERVICES OF CENTRAL FLORIDA, INC.; ET AL. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 20, 1996

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer