Miami-Dade FL Lawyers | Martin John Alexander -- eLawyers

94-50370-RV In Re Edgewater Sun Spot, Inc. (1995)

District Court, N.D. Florida Filed: Jun. 23, 1995 Citations: 183 B.R. 938

183 B.R. 938 (1995) In re EDGEWATER SUN SPOT, INC., and Edgar L. and Jane E. Mathieu, Debtors. EDGEWATER SUN SPOT, INC., Edgar L. Mathieu, and Jane E. Mathieu, Appellants, v. PENNINGTON & HABEN, P.A., Appellee. No. 94-50370-RV. United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division. June 23, 1995. *939 *940 David L. Fleming, David L. Fleming P.A., Gulf Breeze, FL, for Edgewater Sun Spot, Inc., Edgar L. Mathieu, Jane E. Mathieu. Dayten P. Hanson, Pennington, Haben, Wilkinson, Culpepper e..

16-001861 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH vs PALM BEACH COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, AND SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (2016)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 01, 2016

The issue to be determined in this case is whether the Respondents, Florida Department of Transportation (“FDOT”) and Palm Beach County (also referred to as “the Applicants”), are entitled to the issuance of an Environmental Resource Permit (“ERP”) to construct an extension of State Road 7 (“SR 7”) and its associated surface water management system in Palm Beach County.Petitioner failed to prove that the applicants were not entitled to the environmental resource permit to build the SR 7 extension and associated surface water management system.

18-003597GM HEINRICH BRACKER vs CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS FLORIDA, LLC; AND HERNANDO COUNTY, FLORIDA (2018)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 12, 2018

Whether Hernando County Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPAM 1702, adopted by Ordinance No. 2018-12 on June 12, 2018, is “in compliance,” as that term is defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2017).1/Petitioner did not prove beyond fair debate that the County's comprehensive plan amendment was not "in compliance."

16-000628GM CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS FLORIDA, LLC, AND LAKE LOUISA, LLC vs LAKE COUNTY (2016)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 04, 2016

Petitioners proved beyond fair debate that the proposed comprehensive plan amendment was not "in compliance" because it lacks meaningful and predictable standards to guide development and creates internal inconsistencies.

15-004711GM CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS FLORIDA, LLC, AND LAKE LOUISA, LLC vs LAKE COUNTY (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 19, 2015

The issue to be determined in this case is whether the Wellness Way Area Plan Map and Text Amendment to the Lake County Comprehensive Plan (“Remedial Amendment”) adopted through Lake County Ordinance No. 2016-1 is “in compliance,” as defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes.Petitioners proved beyond fair debate that the proposed comprehensive plan amendment was not "in compliance" because it lacks meaningful and predictable standards to guide development and creates internal inconsistencies.

15-005278GM CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS FLORIDA, LLC, AND LAKE LOUISA, LLC vs LAKE COUNTY (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 18, 2015

The issue to be determined in this case is whether the Wellness Way Area Plan Map and Text Amendment to the Lake County Comprehensive Plan (“Remedial Amendment”) adopted through Lake County Ordinance No. 2016-1 is “in compliance,” as defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes.Petitioners proved beyond fair debate that the proposed comprehensive plan amendment was not "in compliance" because it lacks meaningful and predictable standards to guide development and creates internal inconsistencies.

89-10056-CIV United States v. US Fishing Vessel Maylin (1989)

District Court, S.D. Florida Filed: Nov. 08, 1989 Citations: 725 F. Supp. 1222

725 F. Supp. 1222 (1989) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES FISHING VESSEL MAYLIN, including her fishing gear, furniture, engines, appurtenances, stores and cargo, and The Proceeds from the Sale of 431 Pounds of Fish and 377 Pounds of Lobster and Lobster Tails, More or Less, to Wit $1,942.40, Defendant. No. 89-10056-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. November 8, 1989. B.J. Throne-Conte, Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for plaintiff. Michael H. Tarkoff, Miami, Fla.,..

Martin John Alexander