Does Petitioner, AHF MCO of Florida, Inc., d/b/a PHC Florida HIV/AIDS Specialty Plan (Positive), have standing to contest the intended award to Simply for Regions 10 and 11 or to seek rejection of all proposals? (Case No. 18-3507 and 18-3508) Should the intended decision of Respondent, Agency for Health Care Administration (Agency), to contract with Simply Healthcare Plans, Inc. (Simply), for Medicaid managed care plans for HIV/AIDS patients in Regions 10 (Broward County) and Region 11 (Miami-Dade and Collier Counties) be invalidated and all proposals rejected? (Case Nos. 18-3507 and 18-3508) Must the Agency negotiate with Petitioner, South Florida Community Care Network, LLC, d/b/a Community Care Plan (Community), about a plan to provide HIV/AIDS Medicaid managed care services in Region 10 because it was the only responsive proposer of services that was a Provider Service Network (PSN)? (Case No. 18-3512) Must the Agency negotiate with Community to provide Medicaid managed care services in Region 10 for people with Serious Mental Illnesses because Community is a PSN? (Case No. 18-3511) Must the Agency contract with Community to provide Medicaid managed care services for Children with Special Needs in Region 10 because Community is a PSN? (Case No. 18-3513) Must the Agency negotiate with Community to provide Medicaid managed care services for Child Welfare patients in Region 10 because Community is a PSN? (Case No. 18-3514)AHCA did not follow ITN ranking process. Required to reject all responses. AHCA did not follow requirement to negotiate with responsive Provider Service Network offering specialty Medicaid managed care plans. AHCA must negotiate. Evaluators qualified.

Whether the Certificate of Need (“CON”) Application No. 10490 submitted by Baptist Hospital of Miami, Inc. (“Baptist Hospital” or “Baptist”), to establish a new adult autologous and allogeneic bone marrow transplant program in Florida’s Organ Transplant Service Area 4 (“TSA 4”) should be approved.Respondents demonstrated that not normal circumstances justified granting the application for a bone marrow transplant program.

Whether the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission’s (“Respondent” or “FWC”) determination that Tallahassee Corporate Center, LLC (“Petitioner” or “TCC”), submitted a nonresponsive reply to FWC’s Invitation to Negotiate (“ITN”) No. 770-0235 is contrary to the Commission’s governing statutes, the agency’s rules or policies, or the solicitation specifications; and, if so, whether it was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Petitioner did not demonstrate that the proposed agency action was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition or arbitrary and capricious.

Whether the Certificate of Need (CON) Application No. 10420 submitted by Baptist Hospital of Miami, Inc. (Baptist Hospital or Baptist), to establish a new adult autologous and allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT) program in Florida’s Organ Transplant Service Area 4 (TSA 4) should be approved.Consideration of applicable statutory and rule criteria compels a recommendation that an application for a new adult bone marrow transplant program in TSA 4 be denied.

Did Respondent, TR & SNF, Inc., d/b/a The Nursing Center at University Village (TR & SNF), violate requirements to demonstrate the financial ability to operate in accordance with statutes and rules? If so, what penalty should be imposed? (Count I) Did TR & SNF violate requirements to report changes in the administrator or manager of its licensed facility? If so, what penalty should be imposed? (Count II) Did TR & SNF, by committing the offenses charged in Counts I and II, commit violations that support revocation of its nursing home license? (Count III)Although administrators changed, AHCA did not prove that it did not receive notice. SNF did not provide proof of financial ability until after Complaint. Stonewalled request. Revocation recommended.

Whether Petitioner, IMH Healthcare, LLC, was required to submit an application for acquisition of Westport Holdings Tampa, L.P., d/b/a University Village, a specialty insurer licensed to operate a facility that undertakes to provide continuing care, pursuant to section 628.4615, Florida Statutes, and, if so, whether Petitioner has proven its entitlement to approval of the acquisition application.Petitioner was not required to file an acquisition application upon acquisition of a one-percent general partner ownership interest in a CCRC, but if an application is required, it should be denied.

Whether the proposed rules that comprise Florida Administrative Code Chapter 64-4 (Proposed Rules) constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority?The challenged proposed rules regulating low-THC cannabis, including the use of a lottery system to select five dispensaries statewide, are an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.

Whether the proposed rules that comprise Florida Administrative Code Chapter 64-4 (Proposed Rules) constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority?The challenged proposed rules regulating low-THC cannabis, including the use of a lottery system to select five dispensaries statewide, are an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.

Whether the proposed rules that comprise Florida Administrative Code Chapter 64-4 (Proposed Rules) constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority?The challenged proposed rules regulating low-THC cannabis, including the use of a lottery system to select five dispensaries statewide, are an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.

Whether the proposed rules that comprise Florida Administrative Code Chapter 64-4 (Proposed Rules) constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority?The challenged proposed rules regulating low-THC cannabis, including the use of a lottery system to select five dispensaries statewide, are an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.