Hillsborough FL Lawyers | Marvin E Barkin -- eLawyers

4D00-354 State v. Ackerman (2001)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 23, 2001

785 So. 2d 1229 (2001) STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Fred ACKERMAN, Appellee. No. 4D00-354. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. May 23, 2001. *1230 Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Steven R. Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Daniel R. Aaronson of Benjamin & Aaronson, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee. STONE, J. We affirm the order withholding adjudication and placing Ackerman on drug offender probation, pursuant to ..

78385 In Re Inquiry Concerning Carr (1992)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Feb. 20, 1992 Citations: 593 So. 2d 1044

593 So. 2d 1044 (1992) In re INQUIRY CONCERNING a Judge No. 91-44 re Richard W. CARR. No. 78385. Supreme Court of Florida. February 20, 1992. J. Klein Wigginton, Chairman and Roy T. Rhodes, Gen. Counsel, Florida Judicial Qualifications Com'n, Tallahassee, and Marvin E. Barkin, Sp. Counsel to the Florida *1045 Judicial Qualifications Com'n, of Trenam, Simmons, Kemker, Scharf, Barkin, Frye & O'Neill, P.A., Tampa, for petitioner. Richard T. Earle, Jr., St. Petersburg, for respondent. PER CURIAM. Thi..

03-9233 (2004)

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Filed: Aug. 17, 2004 Citations: 380 F.3d 133

380 F.3d 133 April SCALISI, as Custodian for her minor children, Felix Amsler, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FUND ASSET MANAGEMENT, L.P., Merrill Lynch Focus Twenty Fund, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, Merrill Lynch Focus Twenty Fund, Inc. Nominal Defendant-Appellee. Docket No. 03-9233. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued June 18, 2004. Decided August 17, 2004. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Thomas C. Platt, Jr., Senior District Ju..

74--1101 Kenneth White v. Mar-Bel, Inc., and Mr. Dan Marshlack (1975)

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: Apr. 21, 1975 Citations: 509 F.2d 287

509 F.2d 287 185 U.S.P.Q. 129 Kenneth WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MAR-BEL, INC., and Mr. Dan Marshlack, Defendants-Appellees. No. 74-1101. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. March 6, 1975. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied April 21, 1975. Irwin C. Alter, Howard B. Rockman, Chicago, Ill., Harold R. Ainsworth, New Orleans, La., Marvin E. Barkin, Tampa, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant. Stefan M. Stein, Tampa, Fla., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Co..

95-004221RU WITHLACOOCHEE RIVER ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 24, 1995

The issues for determination in this case are whether certain provisions of the 1993 Florida Utility Accommodation Manual which have been adopted by Respondent, the FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, as rules by reference in Rule 14-46.001(3), Florida Administrative Code, constitute invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority. The specific provisions of the 1993 Florida Utility Accommodation Manual which are at issue include the definitions of "utility" and "utility facilities" (page 4), the "no monetary gain" provision (page 7), and the "joint use" provision (page 12). In addition, Petitioners raised an issue as to whether Respondent, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION violated Section 120.535, Florida Statutes, by failing to adopt by rule certain agency requests for information from Petitioner regarding costs associated with the installation and maintenance of utility poles.Rules of Department of Transportation providing for joint use of state rights of way by utilities and for no monetary gain in use of there are valid.

80-002026 PONDEROSA SYSTEM, INC. vs. BUREAU OF SELF INSURANCE (1980)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Mar. 12, 1981

The issue for determination in this proceeding is whether the State of Florida, Department of Labor and Employment Security may revoke the self-insurer status of Ponderosa System, Inc. which was granted by the Department for purposes of self insurance under Florida's Workers' Compensation Law, Chapter 440, Florida Statutes. Proposed Recommended Orders have been submitted by the parties and considered by the Hearing Officer. Those proposed findings not included in this Recommended Order were not considered relevant to the issues, were not supported by competent and substantial evidence, or were considered immaterial to the results reached.Deny application to revoke self-insurer status of Petitioner because no rule mandates a one-to-one ratio for self-insurers.

Marvin E Barkin

4D00-354 State v. Ackerman (2001)

78385 In Re Inquiry Concerning Carr (1992)

03-9233 (2004)

74--1101 Kenneth White v. Mar-Bel, Inc., and Mr. Dan Marshlack (1975)

95-004221RU WITHLACOOCHEE RIVER ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1995)

80-002026 PONDEROSA SYSTEM, INC. vs. BUREAU OF SELF INSURANCE (1980)

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.

Search for lawyers by practice areas.