Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Michael Allen Braverman
Michael Allen Braverman
Visitors: 14
0
Bar #749524(FL)     License for 36 years; Member in Good Standing
Fort Lauderdale FL

Are you Michael Allen Braverman? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

03-002574PL  DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, CRIMINAL JUSTICE STANDARDS AND TRAINING COMMISSION vs CARLOS PINEDA  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 16, 2003
Whether the written statement that Respondent gave on September 17, 1998, at the request of Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) Special Agent John Subic was voluntary and therefore may be used by Petitioner to establish Respondent's guilt of the charge in the Administrative Complaint issued against him.Correctional officer`s statement admitting that the pills found in his vehicle were steroids for his use was admissible on the ground that it was voluntarily given.
96-001481  DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, CRIMINAL JUSTICE STANDARDS AND TRAINING COMMISSION vs JOHN L. EIFERT  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 26, 1996
The issue for determination is whether Respondent committed the offenses set forth in the administrative complaint, and, if so, what action should be taken.Respondent failed to have good moral character at time of incident twelve years ago. However, Respondent prevailed in mitigating circumstances. Recommend reprimand and one-year probation.
19-006607  WISSEM MEJDOUB, ET AL., AS PARTICIPANTS IN THE CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH POLICE OFFICERS' AND FIREFIGHTERS' PENSION PLAN vs CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 12, 2019
The issues are whether any Petitioner has proved by clear and convincing evidence that he timely submitted a request to purchase "Additional Accrual Service" (AAS) credit to the Board of Trustees (Board) of the City of Hallandale Beach Police Officers' and Firefighters' Pension Plan (Plan) in writing or at a public meeting and whether the Board prohibited such Petitioner from purchasing the requested AAS credit.Petitioners proved that local pension plan board prohibited them from purchasing additional accrual rate, but failed to prove that they submitted a written request to do so to the Board or an oral request during a Board meeting.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer