welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Michael J Ciccarone
Michael J Ciccarone
Michael J Ciccarone
Visitors: 49
0
Bar #437646(FL)     License for 40 years
North Fort Myers FL

Are you Michael J Ciccarone? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

90357, 90573 and 90775  Pierpont v. Lee County  (1998)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Mar. 12, 1998 Citations: 710 So. 2d 958
710 So. 2d 958 (1998) Peter F. PIERPONT, et al., Petitioners, v. LEE COUNTY, etc., Respondent. A & G INVESTMENTS, etc., Petitioner, v. LEE COUNTY, etc., Respondent. BARNETT BANKS, INC., Petitioner, v. LEE COUNTY, etc., Respondent. Nos. 90357, 90573 and 90775 Supreme Court of Florida. March 12, 1998. Rehearing Denied June 1, 1998. Robert L. Donald, Fort Myers; William M. Powell, Cape Coral; Stephen E. Dalton of Pavese, Garner, Haverfield, Dalton, Harrison & Jensen, Fort Myers; and Michael J. Cicca..
91-2148  DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERV. v. Holland  (1992)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jul. 10, 1992
602 So. 2d 652 (1992) DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, etc., Appellant, v. Robert Lee HOLLAND, Appellee. No. 91-2148. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. July 10, 1992. *653 Amanda Traweek of Carlton & Carlton, P.A., Lakeland, for appellant. Peter A. Collins of Law Offices of Peter A. Collins, Coral Gables, for appellee. COWART, Judge. The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Child Support Enforcement (HRS) filed a motion o..
99-002212  LARRY M. ALBRIGHT vs RICHARD G. MANNER AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 17, 1999
The issue presented for decision in this case is whether Respondent Richard G. Manner is entitled to an after-the-fact coastal construction control line ("CCCL") permit for construction seaward of the CCCL on the Gulf of Mexico at Fort Myers Beach, Florida.Applicant for after-the-fact coastal construction control line permit failed to present a prima facie case establishing entitlement; neither the application nor any supporting documentation was presented at the final hearing.
95-000098GM  DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS vs LEE COUNTY  (1995)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 11, 1995
Ultimately at issue in this case is whether certain comprehensive plan amendments, adopted by Lee County Ordinance No. 94-30, are "in compliance" with Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes. As reflected in the Preliminary Statement, many of the subordinate issues raised by parties seeking to have the plan amendments found to be "not in compliance" have been withdrawn, and others have been stricken as not timely raised or for other reasons. The remaining issues are addressed in this Recommended Order.Amendments deleted overlay used to settle case on 89 plan, leaving plans % district's or other objectionable measures in mixed use categories and overall located number.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer