Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Michael Stuart Roscoe
Michael Stuart Roscoe
Visitors: 21
0
Bar #125286(FL)     License for 8 years
Tampa FL

Are you Michael Stuart Roscoe? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

20-001469  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs KONA PROPERTIES, LLC, D/B/A GREENLEAF ASSISTED LIVING, LLC  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 20, 2020
Did Respondent, Kona Properties, LLC, d/b/a Greenleaf Assisted Living, LLC (Greenleaf), violate section 429.26(7), Florida Statutes (2019),1 and Florida Administrative Code Rule 59A-36.007(1) and, if so, what penalty should be imposed? (Count I) Did Greenleaf violate section 429.176 and 429.52(4) and (5) and rule 59A-36.010? If it did, what penalty should be imposed? (Count II) Did Greenleaf violate rule 59A-36.010(2) and, if so, what penalty should be imposed? (Count III) Should the Agency impose a survey fee upon Greenleaf pursuant to section 429.19(7)? If so, what amount of fee should be imposed? (Count IV) Did Greenleaf commit one or more Class I violations justifying revocation of its license under section 429.14(1)(e)1.? (Count V) Did Greenleaf violate the background screening requirements of sections 408.809, 429.174, and 435.06(2)(a) through (d)? If so, what penalty should be imposed? (Count VI) Did Greenleaf violate rule 59A-35.110 by not making timely adverse incident reports, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed? (Count VII)AHCA did not prove inadequate training, no background screening, that an adverse incident report was required, and a basis for survey fee imposition by clear & convincing evidence. Hearsay alone will not support a finding of fact.
20-001890  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs KONA PROPERTIES, LLC, D/B/A GREENLEAF ASSISTED LIVING, LLC  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 16, 2020
Did Respondent, Kona Properties, LLC, d/b/a Greenleaf Assisted Living, LLC (Greenleaf), violate section 429.26(7), Florida Statutes (2019),1 and Florida Administrative Code Rule 59A-36.007(1) and, if so, what penalty should be imposed? (Count I) Did Greenleaf violate section 429.176 and 429.52(4) and (5) and rule 59A-36.010? If it did, what penalty should be imposed? (Count II) Did Greenleaf violate rule 59A-36.010(2) and, if so, what penalty should be imposed? (Count III) Should the Agency impose a survey fee upon Greenleaf pursuant to section 429.19(7)? If so, what amount of fee should be imposed? (Count IV) Did Greenleaf commit one or more Class I violations justifying revocation of its license under section 429.14(1)(e)1.? (Count V) Did Greenleaf violate the background screening requirements of sections 408.809, 429.174, and 435.06(2)(a) through (d)? If so, what penalty should be imposed? (Count VI) Did Greenleaf violate rule 59A-35.110 by not making timely adverse incident reports, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed? (Count VII)AHCA did not prove inadequate training, no background screening, that an adverse incident report was required, and a basis for survey fee imposition by clear & convincing evidence. Hearsay alone will not support a finding of fact.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer