Polk FL Lawyers | Michele L Guy -- eLawyers

97-001740 DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DIVISION OF LICENSING vs JAMES B. BROWN (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 10, 1997

Whether Respondent, the holder of a Class "D" Security Officer License and a Class "G" Firearm License, committed the misconduct alleged in the Administrative Complaint and the penalties, if any, that should be imposed.Armed security guard guilty of misconduct when he abandoned his post.

94-005026 DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DIVISION OF LICENSING vs API OF AMERICA, INC., AND MICHAEL W. RELLAH (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 12, 1994

The issue in this case is whether Respondent, API of America, Incorporated, Michael W. Rellah, Owner, committed the violations of Chapter 493, Florida Statutes, alleged in an Administrative Complaint filed May 26, 1994.Respondents' Class "A" and "C" licenses revoked for violations of Section 493.6110

96-002348 DAVID T. BALLARD vs DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DIVISION OF LICENSING (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 16, 1996

Whether Petitioner is entitled to licensure as a Class "D" Security Officer.Battery was directly related to business for which licensure sought and was act of violence. Application for Class ""D"" license should be denied.

96-001338 DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DIVISION OF LICENSING vs FRANK GIORDANO (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 13, 1996

Whether the respondent committed the violations alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint, and, if so, the penalty which should be imposed.License revocation is warranted for security officer who, despite repeated warning, persisted in leaving his assigned post for substantial periods.

95-005217 DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DIVISION OF LICENSING vs DANIEL D. GOLDBERG (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 27, 1995

The issue presented is whether Respondent is guilty of the allegations contained in the Amended Administrative Complaint, as amended, filed against him, and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken against him, if any.Revocation for holder of security agency license for conviction of grand theft and of perjury, a felony and a misdemeanor, respectively.

94-005889 DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DIVISION OF LICENSING vs DANIEL D. GOLDBERG AND FLORIDA BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 19, 1994

At issue is whether the respondents committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and, if so, the penalties which should be imposed.Impose $300 fine for operating a recovery service without valid license and impose a $1500 fine for twice impersonating a police officer.

94-006750 DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DIVISION OF LICENSING vs CHATOYANT AND KEITH P. ACUFF (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 02, 1994

The issue in case number 94-6750 is whether Respondent's Class "A" private investigative agency license should be disciplined. The issue in case number 95-1084S is whether Respondent's application for a Class "C" license should be denied.Respondent guilty of miscounduct-submitted false info to division. Respond- ent also lacked sufficient experience to qualify for investigator's license.

95-000219 CHERUBIM BASTIEN vs DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DIVISION OF LICENSING (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 19, 1995

Whether Petitioner should be granted a Class "D" Security Officer license.Applicant on probation for felony charge not qualified for a class D security officer license.

93-004342 DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND TREASURER vs NATIONAL STATES INSURANCE COMPANY (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 06, 1993

Whether Respondents, by refusing to allow consumers to cancel their individual health insurance policies subsequent to the "free-look" period and thereby failing to refund premiums paid, engaged in conduct violative of Subsection 627.6043, Florida Statutes.Respondents unlawfully refused to refund unearned premiums after the ""free- look period.""

91-003109 DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND TREASURER vs WILLIAM HOUSTON KING (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 17, 1991

By a two-count Amended Administrative Complaint, the Department of Insurance has charged Respondent, a licensed Florida life and health insurance agent, pursuant to Count I with violations of Sections 626.611(7), 626.611(14) and 626.621(8), F.S. arising out of his plea of nolo contendere to a felony charge of grand theft, and pursuant to Count II with violating Section 626.611(7) F.S. arising out of adjudication of guilt to multiple misdemeanor charges of issuing worthless bank checks.Adjudication of guilt on numerous charges of issuing worthless bank checks and plea of nolo contendere without adjudication resulted in suspension, probation.

Michele L Guy