Whether the Respondent's certification as a police officer should be disciplined for alleged violations of Chapter 943, Florida Statutes.Police officer license, no bad character where officer unthinkingly as aside in conversation told fellon some cars might be undercover cars.

The issue for determination at final hearing was whether Respondents committed the offenses set forth in the administrative complaints and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken.Correctional officers committed petit theft from commissary thereby failing to maintain good moral character/mitigating circum./probation and reprimand.

Whether Respondent should grant Petitioner's application for certification as a correctional probation officer.Petitioner's failure to demonstratre successfully every defensive tactic high liability skill is basis for denial of certification.

The issues in this case are framed by the Notice to Show Cause issued by the Petitioner, the Department of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco (the Department), on or about October 9, 1991. The Notice to Show Cause contains a total of 32 counts. Twenty nine (29) counts accuse the Respondent, Bernard Jordan, d/b/a Club Zanzibar, of permitting an agent, servant, patron, or employee to unlawfully possess, sell or deliver a controlled substance (cocaine) to an undercover informant or law enforcement officer on the licensed premises in violation of Sections 893.13(1)(a) and 893.13(1)(f) within Section 561.29(1)(a), Florida Statutes. One count accuses the Respondent of permitting an agent, servant, patron, or employee to unlawfully possess, sell or deliver five (5) liters of non tax paid whiskey (moonshine) to an undercover informant or law enforcement officer on the licensed premises in violation of Sections and 562.451 within Section 561.29(1)(a), Florida Statutes. 1/ One count accuses the Respondent of unlawfully keeping or maintaining the licensed premises for the illegal keeping, using, selling or delivering of substances controlled under Chapter 893.03, in violation of Sections 823.10 and 893.13(2)(a)(5), within Section 561.29(1)(a), Florida Statutes. Finally, the last count accuses the Respondent of failing to exercise due diligence in supervising the licensed premises, allowing it to be used by agents, servants, patrons, or employess for the purpose of possessing, selling, delivering and using illegal substances controlled under Chapter 893.03 (coccaine) and 562.451 (moonshine), 2/ in violation of Sections 823.10 and 561.29(1)(c), Florida Statutes.Evidence of multiple sales of illegal drugs on and near premises proved licensee lacked due diligence and was culpably responsible.

The issue is whether License No. 74-00564 issued to Respondent, Willie Marion Ware d/b/a Silver Shadow (Licensee), should be revoked or otherwise penalized based on the acts alleged in the Notice to Show Cause as amended.Revocation was appropriate for repeated convictions of employing a convicted felon and maintaining a public nuisance.

The issues in this case are framed by the Notice to Show Cause issued by the Petitioner, the Department of Business Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco (the Department), on or about January 22, 1992, in DBR Case No. TA-39-91-0555. The Notice to Show Cause alleges that the Respondent, Florida Premier Clubs, Inc., d/b/a Mako's Bay Club, through its employees, sold alcoholic beverages to minors on November 6, 1991, in violation of Sections 562.11(1)(a) and 561.29(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991). The Respondent denies the charges and also asserts mitigating circumstances and the Florida Responsible Vendor Act defense under Section 561.706, Fla. Stat. (1991).Sales to minors by licensee's employees. DABT did not prove licensee's culpable responsibility.

This is a license discipline case in which the Petitioner seeks to take disciplinary action against the Respondent and his license, including suspension or revocation of the license, on the basis of allegations that the Respondent interfered with a DABT law enforcement sergeant who was inspecting his licensed premises, committed battery on the sergeant, and resisted arrest with violence.Alcoholic beverage licensee interfered and committed battery on officer and resisted arrest arrest with violence and should have license revoked.

The issue in this case is whether the Petitioner, the Department of Business Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, should assess an extra $1,000 license tax against the Respondent, Caldo Corporation, d/b/a Calypso Bay Club, under Section 565.02(1)(g), Fla. Stat. (1989), for operating a place of business where consumption on the premises is permitted which allegedly "has more than three separate rooms or enclosures in which permanent bars or counters are located from which alcoholic beverges are served for consumption on the licensed premises."Evidence did not prove ""three or more separate rooms or enclosures"" with bar or counters. Extra $1000 license tax not due.