Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida
Filed: Dec. 02, 2010
The issues in this case are whether Respondent, a dentist who owns a multidentist practice, (a) failed to keep dental records and medical history records justifying the course of a patient's treatment; (b) billed a patient for dental services that were not actually rendered, thereby committing fraud, deceit, or misconduct; or (c) caused a dental office to be operated in such a manner as to result in substandard dental treatment. If Respondent committed any of these offenses, it will be necessary to determine an appropriate penalty.Respondent found not guilty of having failed to keep adequate dental records; committed fraud, deceit, or misconduct; and caused a dental office to be operated in such a manner as to result in substandard dental treatment.
