welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Patrick Michael Patterson
Patrick Michael Patterson
Patrick Michael Patterson
Visitors: 48
0
Bar #175308(FL)     License for 50 years
Pensacola FL

Are you Patrick Michael Patterson? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Bankruptcy No. 97-4978-8B3  In Re Graffy  (1999)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: May 10, 1999 Citations: 233 B.R. 894
233 B.R. 894 (1999) In the Matter of Mark T. GRAFFY, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 97-4978-8B3. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. May 10, 1999. *895 B. Gray Gibbs, St. Petersburg, FL, for debtor. Terry E. Smith, Bradenton, FL, Trustee. John A. Galotto, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Tax Div., Washington, D.C. ORDER GRANTING INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES THOMAS E. BAYNES, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge. BACKGROUND THIS CAUSE came on for hearing on the Application for Re..
Bankruptcy Nos. 96-10523, 98-00001. Adversary No. 00-686  In Re Wachsmuth Ex Rel. Gussen  (2001)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Aug. 21, 2001 Citations: 272 B.R. 766
272 B.R. 766 (2001) In re Helge WACHSMUTH by and through Dr. Heinrich GUSSEN and Dr. Jörg Schülter, as Bankruptcy Trustee for the Estate of Eckhard Müller-Bückins, a Debtor in a Foreign Proceeding, Debtor. Helge Wachsmuth by and through Dr. Heinrich Gussen and Dr. Jörg Schülter, as Bankruptcy Trustee for the Estate of Eckhard Möller-Bückins, a Debtor in a Foreign Proceeding, Plaintiff, v. Steven E. Cohen, Jacobsen, Cohen & Cohen, P.A., Daniel S. Mandel, Mandel, Weisman & Kirschner, P.A., Marex, I..
82-000935  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY  (1982)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jun. 20, 1983
Respondent continued to erect a sign after provisional okay by Department of Transportation (DOT) had been withdrawn. Recommended Order: sign must come down. Respondent's ad contruction made building sign unnecessary.
82-001444  LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY vs. BILL SALTER ADVERTISING, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1982)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jun. 20, 1983
Application for sign permits denied where the applied-for location would be violative because it is within 500 feet of another sign.
82-002019  LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY vs. BILL SALTER ADVERTISING, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1982)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jun. 20, 1983
Application for sign permit denied where applied-for location for the sign would be violative because it is within 500 feet of another sign.
82-003349  LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY vs. BILL SALTER ADVERTISING, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1982)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jun. 20, 1983
Petitioner was not first-in-time to file for permit to place sign in the contested area. Recommended Order: deny Petitioner's petition and issue no permit.
82-003351  LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY vs. BILL SALTER ADVERTISING, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1982)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jun. 20, 1983
Petitioner denied sign permit because Respondent was first-in-time in applying for a sign permit less than 1,000 feet from Petitioner's proposed site.
80-000713  CONCERNED CITIZENS OF WEST ESCAMBIA COUNTY vs. BRADLEY PROPERTIES, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION  (1980)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jan. 13, 1981
Respondent gave reasonable assurances it could operate in amended permit. Petitioner's challenge must fail, because admininstrative hearing is de novo.
80-001067  CONCERNED CITIZENS OF WEST ESCAMBIA COUNTY vs. FAIRFIELD VILLAGE AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION  (1980)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jan. 13, 1981
Petitioners didn't prove injury in fact in zone of protected interests if Respondent given permit. Recommend dismissal of complaint.
79-000014  PERDIDO KEY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL. vs. RAYMOND M. EWING REALTY, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION  (1979)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 08, 1979
Respondent should be granted waste water treatment facility because it has proven reasonable care.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer