Pinellas FL Lawyers | Paul Grant Rozelle -- eLawyers

Paul Grant Rozelle

Visitors: 63

727-582-6274

Bar #75948(FL) License for 15 years

Largo FL

Are you Paul Grant Rozelle? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 120.57, 120.65, 120.66, 39.01, 39.201, 39.205, 775.082, 775.083, 775.084, 810.09, 90.801

18-000248 PINELLAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE vs JAYNE A. JOHNSON (2018)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 12, 2018

The issue in this matter is whether the Pinellas County Sheriff’s Office properly dismissed Respondent from her employment.Petitioner's decision to terminate Respondent for misuse of her position and unauthorized use of automated resources was appropriate.

15-005054 PINELLAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE vs CYNTHIA GRAHAM (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 14, 2015

The issue in this matter is whether the Pinellas County Sheriff’s Office properly dismissed Respondent from her employment as a deputy sheriff.The Sheriff's Office proved the Sheriff had "cause" to dismiss Respondent based on her violation of its rules and regulations. The Sheriff's Office further proved the discipline imposed was consistent with prior actions. The dismissal should be sustained.

15-000952 PINELLAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE vs RAYMOND FERRIO (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 19, 2015

The issue in this case is whether Petitioner properly terminated Respondent’s employment as a deputy sheriff for engaging in conduct that violated General Order 3-1.1, Rule and Regulation 5.15, governing the custody of arrestees and prisoners.Petitioner proved that Respondent's use of force against an older, sickly inmate in a wheelchair was unnecessary and excessive, justifying termination.

13-003024 PINELLAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE vs RICHARD STOTTS (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 14, 2013

Whether the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office (PCSO or Petitioner) properly terminated Respondent, Richard Stotts, from his employment as a deputy sheriff for engaging in conduct that violated Petitioner's General Order 3-1.1, Rule and Regulation 5.15, regarding the Custody of Arrestees/Prisoners.Respondent violated the Pinellas County Sheriff's Civil Service Act. Sheriff's disciplinary action, termination, is justified.

12-002472 PINELLAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE vs KYLE ALSTON (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 13, 2012

The issues in this case are whether the Respondent, by committing the felony of armed trespass while employed as a deputy sheriff, failed to fulfill his duties and responsibilities as an employee of the Petitioner, and, if so, whether the termination of the Respondent's employment was consistent with applicable disciplinary policy.Sheriff deputy's felony trespass warrants termination from employment.

20-001350 PINELLAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE vs ROY HARPER (2020)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 13, 2020

Whether cause exists to terminate Respondent’s employment.Petitioner proved that Respondent acted outside of the scope of his duties by threatening, without justification, bodily harm towards an inmate. Termination of employment is reasonable and warranted.