welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Ralf Gunars Brookes
Ralf Gunars Brookes
Ralf Gunars Brookes
Visitors: 37
0
Bar #778362(FL)     License for 36 years; Member in Good Standing
Cape Coral FL

Are you Ralf Gunars Brookes? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

USC: 16 U.S.C 668, 33 U.S.C 1251, 33 U.S.C 1311, 33 U.S.C 1313, 33 U.S.C 1342, 33 USC 1342, 5 U.S.C 558

CFR: 33 CFR 64.06, 40 CFR 122.41, 40 CFR 130, 40 CFR 130.7, 40 CFR 130.7, 40 CFR 130.7, 40 CFR 130.7, 40 CFR 130.7, 40 CFR 130.7

Florida Laws: 11.25, 119.07, 119.15, 120.52, 120.536, 120.54, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.573, 120.595, 120.60, 120.68, 120.69, 125.01, 14.202, 163.3161, 163.3162, 163.3164, 163.3167, 163.3168, 163.3177, 163.3178, 163.3180, 163.3184, 163.3187, 163.3191, 163.3202, 163.3215, 163.3245, 163.3248, 187.201, 20.331, 216.311, 253.002, 258.36, 258.42, 26.52, 267.061, 327.40, 327.41, 327.60, 337.0261, 35.01, 35.22, 373.016, 373.042, 373.0421, 373.069, 373.079, 373.113, 373.114, 373.119, 373.129, 373.171, 373.175, 373.219, 373.246, 373.309, 373.403, 373.413, 373.4131, 373.4135, 373.4136, 373.414, 373.4145, 373.416, 373.421, 373.427, 373.4592, 377.241, 377.242, 377.42, 380.04, 380.05, 380.0552, 380.06, 381.0065, 403.021, 403.031, 403.051, 403.061, 403.062, 403.067, 403.086, 403.088, 403.0885, 403.412, 403.804, 403.805, 403.813, 403.9327, 55.03, 57.105, 59.29, 6.10, 7.07, 7.38, 704.06, 768.28, 872.05, 934.02

Florida Administrative Code: 28-106.111, 28-106.201, 28-106.217, 28-106.301, 62-110.106, 62-330.090, 62-330.201, 62-330.301, 62-330.302, 62-330.310, 62-330.315, 62-330.340, 62-342.100, 62-342.400, 62-342.600, 62-345.200, 62-40.432, 62-621.300, 9J-5.002, 9J-5.006

18-24436  Carol Lara  (1985)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida Filed: Aug. 09, 1985 Citations: 52 B.R. 235
52 B.R. 235 (1985) In re K.G.L. CONTRACTING SERVICES, INC., Debtor. COMMERCIAL GENERAL AGENCY, INC., Plaintiff. v. K.G.L. CONTRACTING SERVICES, INC., a Florida corporation, and Insurance Technicians, Inc., a Florida corporation, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 83-00884-BKC-AJC, Adv. No. 85-00242-BKC-AJC-A. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. August 9, 1985. Ronald D. Poltorack, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., Charles Throckmorton, Kozyak, Tropin & Throckmorton, Miami, Fla., Michael K. Wilensky, Holly..
18-005114RP  CITY OF SANIBEL, TOWN OF FORT MYERS BEACH, AND CITY OF CAPE CORAL vs SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 24, 2018
The issues to be determined in this proceeding are: (1) whether the challengers have standing; and (2) whether Proposed Rule 40E-8.221(2) is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.The Petitioners and Intervenors proved standing to bring the proposed rule challenge. The District proved that the proposed MFL for the Caloosahatchee River was not an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
18-006103GM  MARK MORGAN AND JYETTE NIELSEN, AS INDIVIDUALS vs CITY OF MIRAMAR, FLORIDA  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 16, 2018
Whether the City of Miramar Comprehensive Plan Amendment, adopted by Ordinance No. 1901 on October 17, 2018, is “in compliance,” as that term is defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2018).1/Petitioners did not prove the plan amendment created internal inconsistencies with the existing comprehensive plan.
16-004556GM  SEERINA FARRELL, ARIEL HORNER, ADELE SIMONS, MARJORIE HOLT, RONALD BROOKE, KELLY SEMRAD, AND CORNER LAKES ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. vs ORANGE COUNTY  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 11, 2016
Whether Orange County Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2015-2- P-FLUE-1 and 2015-2-A-5-1, adopted by Ordinance 2016-17 on July 12, 2016 (the Plan Amendments), are “in compliance,” as that term is defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2016).1/Petitioners proved beyond fair debate that the plan amendments were internally inconsistent with the comprehensive plan by allowing urban development in the rural service area.
18-004203GM  DAVID ANDERSON, KEATH CUYLER, MITCHELL GOLDBERG, AND RONALD NEWMARK vs IBIS ROAD INVESTORS, LLC; AND SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 10, 2018
Whether Sarasota County Comprehensive Plan Amendment Number 2017-B (the Plan Amendment) adopted by Ordinance Number 2018-006 (the Ordinance) is "in compliance," as that term is defined under section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2018).The Petitioners did not prove beyond fair debate that the Ordinance adopted by Sarasota County approving the Plan Amendment was not in compliance.
18-001940  ALLEN SHANOSKY, CYNTHIA SHANOSKY, AND MICHAEL STECK vs TOWN OF FORT MYERS BEACH AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 13, 2018
The only issue to be resolved is whether a 440-square-foot dock to be constructed by the Town of Fort Myers Beach (Town) creates a navigational hazard and therefore cannot qualify for a regulatory exemption pursuant to section 403.813(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2018).The Town's proposed construction of a small dock will not create a navigational hazard and, therefore, qualifies for an exemption from permitting.
17-000795  SUNCOAST WATERKEEPER, INC.; FLORIDA INSTITUTE FOR SALTWATER HERITAGE, INC.; AND JOSEPH MCCLASH vs LONG BAR POINTE, LLLP, AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 06, 2017
The issue is whether Long Bar Pointe, LLLP's (Long Bar), application for a Mitigation Bank/Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) to establish a mitigation bank on a 260.80-acre coastal site located in western Manatee County should be approved.Petitioners failed to prove that Long Bar did not satisfy criteria for establishment of a mitigation bank in Manatee County.
17-000796  JOSEPH MCCLASH vs LONG BAR POINTE, LLLP AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 06, 2017
The issue is whether Long Bar Pointe, LLLP's (Long Bar), application for a Mitigation Bank/Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) to establish a mitigation bank on a 260.80-acre coastal site located in western Manatee County should be approved.Petitioners failed to prove that Long Bar did not satisfy criteria for establishment of a mitigation bank in Manatee County.
14-004735  JOSEPH MCCLASH vs LAND TRUST NO. 97-12 AND SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 10, 2014
The issue to be determined is whether Respondent Land Trust #97-12 (“Land Trust”) is entitled to an Environmental Resource Permit (“ERP”) for its proposed project on Perico Island in Bradenton, Florida.It is recommended that the agency deny the environmental resource permit because practicable modifications were not made to avoid wetland impacts and cummulative adverse effects of the project would cause significant environmental harm.
14-005038  MANASOTA-88, INC. vs LAND TRUST NO. 97-12 AND SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 23, 2014
The issue to be determined is whether Respondent Land Trust #97-12 (“Land Trust”) is entitled to an Environmental Resource Permit (“ERP”) for its proposed project on Perico Island in Bradenton, Florida.It is recommended that the agency deny the environmental resource permit because practicable modifications were not made to avoid wetland impacts and cummulative adverse effects of the project would cause significant environmental harm.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer