Whether Respondent performed an act which assisted a person or entity in engaging in the prohibited uncertified and unregistered practice of contracting, or whether he applied for and obtained a permit without having entered into a contract to perform the work specified in the permit, as set forth in the Administrative Complaint; and, if so, what is the appropriate sanction.Proof that Respondent assisted an unlicensed person to evade the provisions of chapter 489 and obtained a building permit without entering into a contract warranted fine and suspension.
Whether Respondent violated section 477.029(1)(e), Florida Statutes (2007),1/ regulating licensure as a cosmetologist by the State of Florida, as alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint; and, if so, what is the appropriate sanction.Revocation of license was appropriate for Respondent who paid company to submit an application for licensure containing false evidence.
