Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Randy Ludacer
Randy Ludacer
Visitors: 33
0
Bar #48819(FL)    
Lake Placid FL

Are you Randy Ludacer? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

88-000908GM  DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS vs. MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS  (1988)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 09, 1989
At issue in this proceeding is whether Monroe County's construction of a road on Big Pine Key, Monroe County, Florida, is contrary to the provisions of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. At hearing, petitioner called as witnesses: William Becker; Kurtis Kruer; Thomas Wilmers, accepted as an expert in wildlife management and wildlife biology, specializing in the Key Deer; George Garrett; Deborah Holle, accepted as an expert in wildlife management and wildlife biology, specializing in the Key Deer; Maria Abadal, accepted as an expert planner, with emphasis on the administration of the Florida Area of Critical State Concern program; and William Tipton, accepted as an expert in transportation planning and transportation engineering. Petitioner's exhibits 1-7, 8a-8i, 9-12, 13a-13c, 14 and 15 were received into evidence. Respondent called as witnesses: Robert Harris, accepted as an expert in land surveying and road maintenance; Eugene Lytton, Sr.; Charles Pierce; John Chaffee; Andrew Earl Hanson; David Giggs; and William Becker. Respondent's exhibits 1-8 were received into evidence.County's construction materially altered use and appearance of road and therefore not maintenance-act thus contrary to land use plan for lack of permit.
87-003150  PALOCRAVE INVESTMENTS, LTD., INC.; JAMES J. JAMES; AND BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY vs. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS  (1987)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jan. 26, 1989
The issue presented for decision herein is whether or not petitioners Palocrave Investments Ltd., Inc. (Palocrave), and James J. James, violated the building height restriction established in the Monroe County land development regulations, and if so, what, if any, administrative penalty is appropriate.Whether respondent's violated local development regulations and building height restrictions.
88-000286  DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS vs. MONROE COUNTY AND CIRCLE K. CORPORATION  (1988)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Dec. 27, 1988
This is an appeal, pursuant to Section 380.07, Florida Statutes, to the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission (Adjudicatory Commission) from a development order of Monroe County which granted the application of Circle K Corporation for a building permit to construct a convenience store, with three fuel tanks, on Big Pine Key, Monroe County, Florida. As permitted, the development would allow direct access to U.S. 1 (State Road 5) by way of a curb cut which the petitioner, Department of Community Affairs (Department) contends violates existing land development regulations. The Adjudicatory Commission forwarded the Department's appeal to the Division of Administrative Hearings, and requested the assignment of a Hearing Officer to conduct a hearing pursuant to Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.Monroe County's permit which approved application for direct access to US 1 contrary to its land development regulations.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer