Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Reba Elizabeth Atchison
Reba Elizabeth Atchison
Visitors: 54
0
Bar #786410(FL)     License for 35 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Reba Elizabeth Atchison? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

96-000660  YOGESH MANOCHA vs BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 01, 1996
Is Petitioner entitled to additional credit on the Professional Engineer Licensure Examination sufficient to receive a passing score?Petitioner examinee did not prove entitlement to passing grade for Professional Engineer.
96-000031  ABRAHAM INLONG vs BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 05, 1996
The issue for determination at final hearing is whether the Petitioner is eligible for licensure by the Board of Professional Engineers.Petitioner failed to demonstrate that he was entitled to credit for the challenged exam problem. Deny Licensure.
96-000032  RAMON L. AROSEMENA vs BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 05, 1996
This is a licensure examination proceeding in which the Petitioner asserts entitlement to a higher grade on the examination.Evidence in examination challenge case was insufficient to show entitlement to higher grade.
98-002717  BANS N. PERSAUD vs BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY  (1998)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 15, 1998
Whether Petitioner, Bans N. Persaud, should be awarded a passing grade on the "Financial Accounting" part of the Certified Public Accounting examination given on May 7-8, 1997.Challenge to failing grade on finance and accounting part of Certified Public Accountant Exam recommended to be rejected.
98-000820  CHERYL R. WIERZBA vs BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE  (1998)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 19, 1998
Whether Petitioner's challenge regarding the June 1997 landscape architecture licensure examination should be sustained.Applicant`s challenge regarding 1997 landscape architecture licensing examination without merit.
98-001867BID  ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION  (1998)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 21, 1998
At issue in this proceeding is whether the decision of Respondent, Department of Business and Professional Regulation (Department), to award the subject bid to Intervenor, Psychological Services, Inc. (PSI), comported with the essential requirements of law.Bid award failed to follow propsed specifications. Consequently, protest sustained and recommended protester be awarded the bid.
98-000448  JAMES JENKINS, JR. vs BARBER`S BOARD  (1998)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 26, 1998
Should Respondent receive a passing score on the practical portion of the Barber Examination given on January 13, 1997?Petitioner failed to present sufficient evidence that grading was arbitrary, capricious, or devoid of logic or reason.
97-005395  NINA ODOM vs BARBER`S BOARD  (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 18, 1997
The issue in this case is whether Petitioner should have received a passing grade on the written part of her barber examination.Applicant required to pay full examination fee and retake both parts of exam even if one part of exam was successfully completed.
97-003352  SCOTT D. WALKER vs BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS  (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 17, 1997
The issue for consideration in this case is whether Petitioner should be granted extra credit for questions numbers 320, 321, 322, and 323, for which he gave allegedly incorrect answers, on the October 1996, Environmental Engineer Examination administered by the Department.Petitioner failed to show he was entitled to additional credit for his answers on the October 1996 environmental engineering examination.
97-003353  BAHMAN BEHZADI vs BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS  (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 17, 1997
The issue for consideration in this case is whether Petitioner should be awarded additional credit for his answer to question number 290, and thereby be given a passing grade on the Professional Engineer examination administered on October 25, 1996, in Orlando.Unsuccessful exam candidate did not show by a preponderance of the evidence that his exam was improperly or unfairly graded.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer