Leon FL Lawyers | Reba Elizabeth Atchison -- eLawyers

93-004210BID PANHANDLE GRADING AND PAVING, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 29, 1993

The issue addressed in this proceeding is whether Petitioner or Intervenor submitted the lowest and best bid on Project No. RS-40.Bid award appropriate where Department's criteria were misconstrued. Department entitled to enforce its established criteria. No fraud illegality etc shown.

94-001350BID FSM, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 14, 1994

The issue for determination in this proceeding is whether a contract for a perimeter security system at Calhoun Correctional Institution and Holmes Correctional Institution should be awarded to Intervenor.Bid by two corporations as partners was responsive where one corporation held license required in bid documents. Award of bid to lowest bidder not arbitrary.

93-007111BID NATIONAL MEDICAL CARE, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 22, 1993

Whether the decision by the State of Florida, Department of Corrections (DOC) to reject all bids received in response to Request For Proposal 93-RIVHSD- 075 (RFP) was arbitrary, capricious, fraudulent, illegal or dishonest. Additionally, Intervenor challenges Petitioner's standing to bring this proceeding since Bio-Medical Applications, Petitioner's wholly-owned subsidiary corporation, submitted the bid at issue and because Petitioner would not be a party to any contract awarded pursuant to the RFP.Petitioner has standing where facts alleged met both prongs of agrico test. Peittioner stipulated to factrs indicating agy did not act arbitr. illegaly

93-002611 HI TE, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 10, 1993

Whether Petitioner is entitled to additional compensation pursuant to the contract between Petitioner and Respondent for the site work and utilities for the new food service facility and medical addition at Glades Correctional Institution, Project No. PH/NB/NQ-06.Contractor not entitled to additional compensation after executing change or DER.

93-003971BID BUTLER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 22, 1993

Whether the Department of Corrections (hereinafter referred to as the "Department") should sustain Petitioner's challenge to the preliminary determination to award the contract for Department Project No. NV-30A to McMahan Construction Company, Inc.?Lowest Bidder's submission of more than one r.o. qualif. form not a devia- tion from bid specs and thus DOC acted properly in not rejecting bid.

91-005753 DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE vs FIRST EAGLE, INC.; GREGORY J. SIMONDS; TERRY D. BIXLER; ROBERT C. VALERIUS; CANOUSE AND BAUM (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 05, 1991

Whether the Respondents committed the offenses set forth in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, the penalties that should be imposed.Branch managers of securities dealer reprimanded where sales of penny stocks occurred through branch without complying with ""cold call"" rule.

90-006606 ROBERT C. PERLMAN vs OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER, DIVISION OF SECURITIES (1990)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 17, 1990

Whether or not Petitioner's application for registration as an associated person of First Gateway Securities, Inc. should be approved.Whether Petitioner's application for registration as an associated person should be approved.

90-001612 DEERFIELD SECURITIES, INC., AND EDWARD T. STREHLAU vs DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE (1990)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 14, 1990

The issue for consideration herein was whether the Petitioners should be granted registration as a dealer and associated person/principal, respectively, for securities in the State of Florida.Failure of both individual and corporate dealer applicants to provide appropriate information constitues disqualifying unworthiness and waives agency action time.

Reba Elizabeth Atchison