Hillsborough FL Lawyers | Ricardo Chris Muratti -- eLawyers

98-002430 ARCHIPELAGO COMMUNITY ASSOC., INC. vs DUANE RAAB AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 28, 1998

Whether the finger pier portion of Respondent Raab's dock creates a navigational hazard. The resolution of that issue will determine whether the dock qualifies for an exemption from an environmental resource permit under Rule 40E-4.051(3)(b), Florida Administrative Code, and Section 403.813, Florida Statutes.The dock met the criteria for exemption.

99-000294 EDWARD SCOTT vs LARRY LEWIS AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 22, 1999

Whether the application of Respondent Lewis for an Environmental Resource Permit to construct a finger pier qualifies for an exemption from the need to obtain such a permit.Applicant for environmental resource permit to construct finger pier in artificially created waters established entitlement to an exemption because the pier would not violate water quality standards, impede navigation or adversely affect flood control.

99-000289 HOWARD VOGEL AND EUGENIA VOGEL vs GEORGE WENTWORTH AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 21, 1999

The issue presented is whether Respondent George Wentworth is entitled to a noticed general permit and consent to use sovereign submerged lands for a dock and boathouse.Dock and boathouse in an aquatic preserve did not meet the criteria for a noticed general permit and consent to use sovereign submerged lands without changes to its design.

99-000689 J. HOWARD LOVETT vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 16, 1999

Is Petitioner entitled to an after-the-fact coastal construction control line (CCCL) permit for existing construction seaward of the CCCL in Gulf County, Florida? If not, should the existing construction be removed? See Section 161.053, Florida Statutes; and Chapter 62B-33, Florida Administrative Code.Applicant is not entitled to an after-the-fact permit. The dock presents a risk to upland properties if it is dislodged in a storm.

98-002031 RICHMOND HOTEL CORPORATION vs CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 01, 1998

Whether the application submitted on behalf of the City of Miami Beach, Florida (City) for a coastal construction control line (CCCL) permit should be approved.Amended Recommended Order entered to provide additional findings required by remand from agency. Entire project is required for erosion prevention.

98-002184 JOHN WORKMAN vs CHUCK EMLING AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 12, 1998

The issue to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether a modification of a general permit should be issued by the Respondent agency Department of Environmental Protection (Department), to the Respondent, Chuck Emling, so as to allow construction and operation of a stormwater discharge facility on Emling's property in Gulf Breeze, Florida.Respondent showed reasonable assurance that standards of Chapter 62-25, Florida Administrative Code, regarding storewater management and treatment would be met because of compliance with the on-site containment criteria for general permits.

98-002210 HARLLEE PACKING, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 14, 1998

The issue in this case is whether the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) should revoke the Petitioner's exemption from the requirement to obtain a General Permit for Disposal of Tomato Wash Water under Florida Administrative Code Rule 62-660.805.DEP revoked permit exemption issued by DER for tomato wash operation although operation used less than 5,000 gpd of wash-water. Evidence not clear why exemption issued. Under proper interpretation of rule, no permit should have been issued. RO: revoke.

98-002006 EDMOND BLOUNT, JR.; EDMOND BLOUNT, SR.; ROBERT DAVENPORT; AND GERARD MURNAN vs CITY OF MEXICO BEACH AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 30, 1998

Is the City of Mexico Beach (the City or Applicant) entitled to the issuance of a joint coastal permit and consent to use of sovereign submerged land for the Mexico Beach Canal (Main Canal) and a municipal flushing outlet adjacent to 8th Street (8th Street outlet)? Those permits would be issued by the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) in response to DEP Application File No.: 0124938-001JC and DEP Application File No.: 0129039- 001JC, respectively.The City is entitled to joint coastal permit and consent to use sovereign submerged lands to dredge and excavate for municipal projects.

97-002481 STANLEY AND PATSY KENCIK vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 22, 1997

The issue in this case is whether the application submitted by Stanley and Patsy Kencik for an after-the fact coastal construction control line (CCCL) permit for an existing and expanded multi-level deck seaward of the CCCL in Panama City, Florida, complies with the applicable provisions of Sections 161.053, Florida Statute, and Rule 62B-33, Florida Administrative Code, and should be granted.Evidence did not support issuance of after the fact CCCL permit for enhanced and expanded deck built after hurricane destroyed original deck.

97-004943 PATRICIA MORELAND vs CITY OF GULF BREEZE AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 21, 1997

The issue is whether Respondent Department of Environmental Protection properly determined that Respondent City of Gulf Breeze was entitled to construct a concrete jetty at the mouth of Gilmore Bayou, to widen the mouth of the bayou an additional 35 feet, and to dredge sections of the bayou to a depth of minus eight feet.City of Gulf Breeze entitled to construct a concrete jetty at mouth of bayou, to widen the bayou's mouth, and to dredge bayou to a depth of minus eight feet.

Ricardo Chris Muratti